BPR Quote of the Day: AKA Last Refuge of the Scoundral

“You’ll never have a quiet world till you knock the patriotism out of the human race.” 

        George Bernard Shaw  

Posted in Quotations | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Awaiting the Next Kent State

When the authorities get tired of pepper spray, and really want to teach protesters a lesson, what will be their next move? As economic conditions worsen, demonstrations increase, and police feel overwhelmed, my  fear is we may not get through to the end of this year without Americans being gunned down during a protest. I hope I’m wrong.

Posted in civil liberties, government, law, Occupy, Occupy Wall Street, protest | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

BPR Quote of the Day: Being Hopeful

“To be hopeful in bad times is not just foolishly romantic. It is based on the fact that human history is a history not only of cruelty, but also of compassion, sacrifice, courage, kindness. What we choose to emphasize in this complex history will determine our lives…And if we do act, in however small a way, we don’t have to wait for some grand utopian future  The future is an infinite succession of presents, and to live now as we think human beings should live, in defiance of all that is bad around us, is itself a marvelous victory.”

Howard Zinn

 

Posted in Quotations | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Ending Authoritarianism and Plutocracy in the U.S.

By Rocky Anderson

 Presidential Candidate, Justice Party, March 26, 2012,  speaking at Hinckley Institute of Politics, at The University of Utah 

Let us consider the fundamental guiding principles for the United States of America — freedom, equal opportunity, compassion, and security.

Then let us consider how those principles have been severely undermined, and how we, the American people, can restore them so that once again our government is ofby, and for the people, rather than a tool of oppression cynically utilized for the benefit of a small, powerful, abusive, elite political and financial class, to the detriment of the vast majority of U.S. citizens, as well as billions of people around the world.

We often hear it said that the United States is the greatest nation in the world.  What exactly is meant by that?  And is it true?  The more important question is: Can we, the American people, make this, once again, a great and proud nation — a nation that lives up to its original promise?  We can achieve that — if only wewill.

Who are we as a people, what do we really believe in, and just what does our nation stand for?  How far have we drifted away — or, rather, bolted away —  from what we once were?  And how do we, once again, attain greater freedom, more equal opportunity, compassion, and security for all?

These questions have never been more vital to consider and confront.  Our nation has been transformed in just a few short years — virtually unrecognizable in fundamental respects when compared to the republic that once proudly proclaimed a constitutional system of checks and balances, the rule of law, and constitutional protections of due process, restraints on war-making, and a truly balanced system of separation of powers among three co-equal branches of government.

We are at a nation-changing — even world-changing — fork in the road.  We can continue on the path of becoming more totalitarian, even fascist, with an imperial presidency that continues to accrue to itself unprecedented tyrannical powers; more greedy as a nation and as a people; less capable to compete on a global stage; more empire-building and war-mongering; less equal under the law; more divided, in terms of income and wealth, between a tiny elite financial aristocracy and the rest of our citizenry; more cruel toward men, women, and children, here and abroad, who are not part of the elite political and financial classes; and less secure, as a nation and as individuals, now and in the future.

Or we can turn things around radically, becoming more free and respectful of the fundamental rights and interests of people in the U.S. and elsewhere, with restraints on executive power — and accountability for abuses of that power — as contemplated by the founders and by our Constitution; more generous and helpful as a nation and as a people; more capable of competing with other nations, their students, and their workersmore cooperative and friendly toward other nations; more committed to liberty and justice for all; more prosperous, with a strong, healthy middle class, capable of living rewarding lives through equal opportunity; kinder and more compassionate toward our own citizens, immigrants, and men, women, and children in other nations; and more secure in our homes, our communities, and our nation, presently and in the future.

The second sentence of the Declaration of Independence sets forth the general guiding principles of the founding of our great nation:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

There could be no stronger affirmation of our nation’s guiding principles of freedom, equal opportunity, compassion, and personal, familial, community, and national security.

These guiding principles ring loudly in the first sentence of our Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The guiding principles, then, set forth in the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution are that people — all people, not just citizens of the United States — are created as equals, they all have unalienable rights, including the right to life, the right to liberty and the right to pursue happiness, that we seek to establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility (that is, peace), provide for the defense of our nation (that is, security), promote the welfare of everyone, and secure liberty not only for us, but for later generations — “our posterity”.

It is for each generation to exercise conscientious diligence in sustaining those guiding principles.  Sadly — tragically –, those who were to have represented our interests in Washington, particularly during these past ten years, have severely undermined those principles.  And we, the people, have not sufficiently spoken out and acted to return our nation to the principled course set by the Founders.  But we can — if only we will.  (Continued)

Read entire speech at Justice Party of Texas

Boldface Added by BPR Editor
Posted in civil liberties, Economics, elections, foreign policy, government, Justice, military, politics, war | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

The High Price of Materialism

What a un-American concept! More stuff doesn’r always mean more happiness; consumerism is not good for the environment; materialism does not promote social values. Where will this kind of radical philosophy lead us? Dare we even think about it?

Video produced by The Center For a New American Dream, which works to raise awareness of the negative impact of our hyper-consumer culture. 

You may also wish to check out my March 5 post “Advertising’s High Cost to Society! Read This Now! You’ll Like It!”

Posted in Economics, environment, inequality, media, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Numbers That Count: The War on Drugs

DRUGS AND PRISONS: TIME FOR A NEW STRATEGY?

by Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

DRUG CONVICTIONS, PER 100,000 ADULTS IN U.S.:  [1)

1980: 15 ; 1996: 148 ; Today: 380+ (#1 in the world).

 PRISONERS PER 100,000 CITIZENS:  [1]

Japan-63, German-90, France-96, Mexico-208, Britain-153,  U.S. 1980-150, U.S. 2011760 (#1 in the world).

ARRESTS ON DRUG CHARGES IN THE U.S.:   [1]

1.66 million in 2009 (#1 in the world).

DRUG CRIME IMPRISONMENTS IN THE U.S. (est.):  [2]

1980: 41,000

Today: 500,000+


TOTAL SPENDING IN CALIFORNIA (2010)  [1]

Prisons-$9.6 billion;    Higher Education-$5.7 billion

PERCENT OF CALIFORNIA STATE BUDGET:  [3]

1980: Prisons 3%, Education 10%

2010: Prisons 11%, Education 7.5%  

 PER CAPITA SPENDING IN CALIFORNIA: [1]

$8,667 per college student

$45,006 per prisoner

NEW CONSTRUCTION IN CALIFORNIA SINCE 1980:   [1)

Prisons: 21, Colleges: 1

 RECIDIVISM RATES IN CALIFORNIA (AFTER 3 YEARS IN PRISON):  [3]

1981: 32.7 %

2010: 71.3% (highest in the nation)

[1] “Incarceration Nation” by Fareed Zakaria/Time/ April 2, 2012
 [2] The Sentencing Project, “A 25-Year Quagmire:  The War on Drugs and Its Impact on American Society,” 2007.
[3]  California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (2011)

PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM 04/02/2012


Posted in crime, Justice, law | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Greatest Hits of Clarence Thomas

    New Blank Book Proposal (by Arlen Grossman/The Big Picture Report):

     THE COLLECTED GREATEST ORAL         ARGUMENTS OF JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS


The Best Arguments, Questions, and Observations of Justice Clarence Thomas from  Supreme Court Oral Argument Sessions, 2006-2012

150 Blank Pages

Posted in law, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Victims of the American Empire: Us

EMPIRES THEN AND NOW

By Paul Craig Roberts/ Institute for Political Economy/ March 26, 2012

Great empires, such as the Roman and British, were extractive. The empires succeeded, because the value of the resources and wealth extracted from conquered lands exceeded the value of conquest and governance. The reason Rome did not extend its empire east into Germany was not the military prowess of Germanic tribes but Rome’s calculation that the cost of conquest exceeded the value of extractable resources.

The Roman empire failed, because Romans exhausted manpower and resources in civil wars fighting amongst themselves for power. The British empire failed, because the British exhausted themselves fighting Germany in two world wars.

In his book, The Rule of Empires (2010), Timothy H. Parsons replaces the myth of the civilizing empire with the truth of the extractive empire. He describes the successes of the Romans, the Umayyad Caliphate, the Spanish in Peru, Napoleon in Italy, and the British in India and Kenya in extracting resources. To lower the cost of governing Kenya, the British instigated tribal consciousness and invented tribal customs that worked to British advantage.

Parsons does not examine the American empire, but in his introduction to the book he wonders whether America’s empire is really an empire as the Americans don’t seem to get any extractive benefits from it. After eight years of war and attempted occupation of Iraq, all Washington has for its efforts is several trillion dollars of additional debt and no Iraqi oil. After ten years of trillion dollar struggle against the Taliban in Afghanistan, Washington has nothing to show for it except possibly some part of the drug trade that can be used to fund covert CIA operations.

America’s wars are very expensive. Bush and Obama have doubled the national debt, and the American people have no benefits from it. No riches, no bread and circuses flow to Americans from Washington’s wars. So what is it all about?

The answer is that Washington’s empire extracts resources from the American people for the benefit of the few powerful interest groups that rule America. The military-security complex, Wall Street, agri-business and the Israel Lobby use the government to extract resources from Americans to serve their profits and power. The US Constitution has been extracted in the interests of the Security State, and Americans’ incomes have been redirected to the pockets of the 1 percent. That is how the American Empire functions.

The New Empire is different. It happens without achieving conquest. The American military did not conquer Iraq and has been forced out politically by the puppet government that Washington established. There is no victory in Afghanistan, and after a decade the American military does not control the country.

In the New Empire success at war no longer matters. The extraction takes place by being at war. Huge sums of American taxpayers’ money have flowed into the American armaments industries and huge amounts of power into Homeland Security. The American empire works by stripping Americans of wealth and liberty.

This is why the wars cannot end, or if one does end another starts. Remember when Obama came into office and was asked what the US mission was in Afghanistan? He replied that he did not know what the mission was and that the mission needed to be defined.

Obama never defined the mission. He renewed the Afghan war without telling us its purpose. Obama cannot tell Americans that the purpose of the war is to build the power and profit of the military/security complex at the expense of American citizens.

This truth doesn’t mean that the objects of American military aggression have escaped without cost. Large numbers of Muslims have been bombed and murdered and their economies and infrastructure ruined, but not in order to extract resources from them.

It is ironic that under the New Empire the citizens of the empire are extracted of their wealth and liberty in order to extract lives from the targeted foreign populations. Just like the bombed and murdered Muslims, the American people are victims of the American empire.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal
Boldface added by BPR Editor
Posted in Afghanistan, foreign policy, Iraq, military, politics, war | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obama’s Burden

THE RIGHT-WING MEDIA MACHINE VS. BARACK OBAMA

by Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

You may have heard it said that if President Obama discovered a cure for cancer, he would be criticized for putting oncologists out of work.

While amusing, there is truth to it. Consider the powerful influence of Fox News, right-wing talk radio, and other conservative media influences. White House communications director Anita Dunn stirred up a firestorm in 2009 when she labeled Fox News a “wing of the Republican Party.” However, everyone understood what she was talking about.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) famously said in 2010, “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.” Combine that shot across the president’s bow with incessant attacks by right-wing media outlets, and the task of convincing the American people that the policies of the president and his party were good for the country became all that much tougher.

It should be obvious to anyone paying attention to the news that almost anything that President Obama and the Democrats do or propose to do is severely criticized by the right-wing media and the GOP in Congress. Republicans will often even abandon their own legislation and ideas if embraced by the White House.

With so many Americans, especially in the South and the middle of the country, relying on conservative media, there is at least 30 to 40 percent of the country that will rarely hear anything nice  or even neutral about Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. No matter how well things go, Obama’s media burden ensures the President’s approval ratings will never rise higher than 55 to 60 percent. And if conditions are not going well, his approval rating will sink much lower and he will be blamed, no matter how little his influence on the problem. The recent spike in gas prices, blamed on President Obama by many, is a good example.

A Rasmussen poll last week reported Americans favor repeal of Obama’s Health Care Law 56% to 39%.  This shouldn’t be surprising, considering “Obamacare” is attacked  and demonized daily by all the Republican presidential candidates and hourly by the right-wing news and opinion sources. And since President Obama is regarded as the titular head of his party, the media largely ignores what other Democratic leaders are saying.

This media burden is made all the more difficult because President Obama is not one to go on a vigorous offensive to promote his policies, preferring instead to appear bipartisan and moderate whenever possible. Republicans feel no such restraint and use their enormous media clout to sway public opinion.

There is one more advantage conservative media holds over liberal/progressive media. The righties allow certain segments of the public to feel okay about expressing their irrational fears and prejudices. If it is acceptable for Rush, Hannity, Savage, etc to verbally attack and poke fun at others who look or act different, and to act selfish and self-centered, then it implies permission for their audience to feel and behave the same.

In years past, when America was less ideologically divided, almost everyone could agree that the Moon Landing in 1969 was a great event for the whole country, as was President Nixon’s 1972 trip to China and President Carter’s Camp David peace accord between Israel and Egypt in 1978. We saw bipartisan support for civil rights, Medicare, and environmental legislation during those years.

There is almost nothing President Obama and the Democrats could do or propose now that will get support from Republicans and their media outlets. Even worse, the Right appears to have no problem distorting facts and lying.  They realize they won’t be called on their errors by the conservative media, so anything said, true or false, is justified as part of their mission to defeat Democrats and take control of every branch of government.

Is Obama’s race the major factor for all the right-wing negativity?  While there is certainly some racism fueling the hate in certain musty corners of the conservative movement, I don’t believe it to be the defining issue. Bill Clinton was vilified by the Right from Day One of his presidency and they never let up. I believe Obama’s Burden is  the result of a deliberative strategy funded by wealthy corporatists (The Koch Brothers and other billionaires, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, etc.) funding free-market think tanks and buying up media outlets, in alliance with evangelical Christians and other social and  ideological conservatives. This long-range strategy has paid huge dividends in recent years, culminating in their virtual monopoly of news content across a good swath of our nation.

It is fair to say that some media networks and shows are clearly biased toward the Democrats and the Left, but there is no evidence that they use outright lies and factual distortions to anywhere near the extent used by the Right.

The powerful right-wing media machine, combined with the unlimited campaign coffers unleashed by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, puts President Obama and his allies on the Left at a decided disadvantage when it comes to influencing public opinion. It’s as if they are starting a race carrying a heavy weight on their shoulders while running to the November election finish line. It is a burden that will require a lot of muscle and luck to overcome.

PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM 03/28/2012

Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, media, politics, Republican Party | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rare National TV Commercial Promotes Church-State Separation

The Freedom From Religion Foundation, a state/church watchdog and the nation’s largest freethought association, is placing its first national ad on the “CBS Evening News” tonight. This same ad debuted on “CBS Sunday Morning” yesterday. 

–FFRF News Release

Posted in government, religion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment