You Couldn’t Take Away Our Freedom, bin Laden….That’s Our Job

The War on Terror and its various civil liberties assaults have escalated, not been reversed or even slowed down

By Glenn Greenwald/ Salon.com/ May 1, 2012

In the wake of Osama bin Laden’s summary execution one year ago, many predicted that the War on Terror would finally begin to recede. Here’s what has happened since then:

*With large bipartisan majorities, Congress renewed the once-controversial Patriot Act without a single reform, and it was signed into law by President Obama; Harry Reid accused those urging reforms of putting the country at risk of a Terrorist attack.

* For the first time, perhaps ever, a U.S. citizen was assassinated by the CIA, on orders from the President, without a shred of due process and far from any battlefield; two weeks later, his 16-year-old American son was also killed by his own government; the U.S. Attorney General then gave a speech claiming the President has the power to target U.S. citizens for death based on

* With large bipartisan majorities, Congress enacted, and the President signed, a new law codifying presidential powers of worldwide indefinite detention and an expanded statutory defintion of the War on Terror.

* Construction neared completion for a sprawling new site in Utah for the National Security Agency to enable massive domestic surveillance and to achieve “the realization of the ‘total information awareness’ program created during the first term of the Bush administration.”

* President Obama authorized the use of “signature” drone strikes in Yemen, whereby the CIA can target people for death “even when the identity of those who could be killed is not known.”

* The U.S. formally expanded its drone attacks in Somalia, “reopening a base for the unmanned aircraft on the island nation of Seychelles.”

* A U.S. drone killed 16-year-old Pakistani Tariq Aziz, along with his 12-year-old cousin, Waheed, three days after the older boy attended a meeting to protest civilian deaths from U.S. drones (another of Tariq’s cousins had been killed in 2010).

* NATO airstrikes continued to extinguish the lives of Afghan children; in just the last 24 hours, 5 more Afghan children were killed by the ongoing war.

* The FBI increased its aggressive attempts to recruit young Muslim-American males into Terror plots which the FBI concocts, funds, encourages, directs and enables, while prosecuting more and more Muslims in the U.S. for crimes grounded in their political views and speech.

Does it sound like the War on Terror and its accompanying civil liberties erosions are ending, or going in the opposite direction? The morning after the bin Laden killing, I wrote that the killing of bin Laden would likely re-ignite American excitement over militarism and would thus likely further fuel, rather than retard, the War and its various implications. As always: combatting Terrorism is not the end of the War on Terror; the War on Terror is the end in itself, and Terrorism is merely its pretext.

Boldface added by BPR Editor
Posted in Afghanistan, civil liberties, foreign policy, Justice, law, Pakistan, Terrorism, war | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Half-Full or Half-Empty?

Which America Do You Live In:  Newsweek’s SuperCountry or Robert Reich’s Stalled “Tinder-Box”?

by Arlen Grossman

Newsweek’s May 7 cover reveals a man’s shirt ripped off to reveal Superman–with a big “$” on his chest instead of an “S”–and the headline: “America is Winning-And Why.” Financial journalist Daniel Gross describes a quickly recovering nation “bigger, stronger, and faster than anywhere else in the world.”

That same week, in two blogs, economist and former Labor Secretary Robert Reich describes a “Tinder-Box Society” with an economy “Heading For a  Big Stall.”

Same country. Far different perceptions. Who is right? You decide.

Newsweek’s America: “Like the world’s first bionic man, the U.S. economy has come back—better, stronger, and faster than most analysts expected, and than most of its peers. In fact, the lows of March 2009 marked the beginning of an unexpected recovery—not the beginning of an era of irreversible stagnation…The stock market has doubled since March 2009, while corporate profits and exports have surged to records. The U.S. economy has regained its 2007 peak, and is now growing at a 3 percent annual clip—a more rapid pace than any other developed economy.”

Reich’s America:  “The Dow Jones Industrial Average hit 13,338 Tuesday, its highest since December, 2007. The S&P 500 added 16 points. Wall Street will remember May 1 as a great day. But most of these gains are going to the richest 10 percent of Americans who own 90 percent of the shares traded on Wall Street. And the lion’s share of the gains are going to the wealthiest 1 percent.”

Newsweek’s America: “It took the U.S. just 18 months to conduct the aggressive fiscal and monetary actions that Japan waited 12 years to carry out after its credit bubble burst. But America’s recovery since then has been fueled by a resilient and nimble private sector. Rather than sit around and wait for salvation, U.S. companies quickly moved to restructure operations and debt.”

Reich’s America:  “Shares are up because corporate profits are up, and profits are up largely because companies have figured out how to do more with less.”

Newsweek’s America:  “Rather than sink deeper into a financial morass, the American private sector emerged better: better equipped to meet obligations, to save, to invest, to spend, and, ultimately, to grow …And rather than throw in the towel and surrender to Chinese competitors, U.S. companies figured out how to get more out of existing resources….From the fourth quarter of 2008 to the fourth quarter of 2009, productivity rose 5.4 percent. And it rose an impressive 4.1 percent in 2010.”

Reich’s America: “One of the most striking legacies of the Great Recession has been the decline of full-time employment – as companies have substituted software or outsourced jobs abroad (courtesy of the Internet, making outsourcing more efficient than ever), or shifted them to contract workers also linked via Internet and software. That’s why most of the gains from the productivity revolution are going to the owners of capital, while typical workers are either unemployed or underemployed, or else getting wages and benefits whose real value continues to drop.”

Newsweek’s America:  “For U.S. companies, focusing on efficiency and productivity has been the equivalent of a runner strengthening her core. But companies now run farther and faster because of their ability to engage external forces. Declinists believe that the structural forces transforming the global economy are arrayed against us. But in fact, many of them work in America’s favor. The U.S. remains the largest, richest, most secure market in the world, full of valuable resources.”

Reich’s America:  “{Owners of capital are} now advocating austerity economics, on the false basis that cuts in public spending – including education, infrastructure, and safety nets – will generate more “confidence” and “certainty” among lenders and investors, and also lead to more jobs and better wages. None of this is sustainable, economically or socially.”

Newsweek’s America:  “The U.S. is losing primacy in geopolitics, but it remains the indispensable economic nation. The systems that American companies have invented are being put to vital use.”

Reich’s America:    “{Austerity measures are} not sustainable economically because it has resulted in chronically inadequate demand for goods and services. That’s meant anemic growth punctuated by recessions. Without a larger share of the economic gains, the vast middle class doesn’t have the purchasing power to buy the goods and services an ever-more productive economy can generate.”

Newsweek’s America:  “It’s easy to look at the record of the past few years and despair. The U.S. has a very long way to go to make up for lost ground in housing and, especially, in jobs. The resurgence of the corporate sector, which provides ample reason for optimism, hasn’t translated into new positions for the legions of unemployed. But here, too, there’s positive news. Since February 2010, the private sector… has added nearly 4.1 million jobs, or about 160,000 per month. That’s not sufficient, but it’s a sign that the jobs machine is clearly working again.” 

Reich’s America:   “The Commerce Department reports that the economy as a whole has slowed from the last quarter of 2011 when it was expanding at an annual rate of 3 percent, to 2.2 percent for the first quarter of this year. And last month’s unemployment report showing only 120,000 new jobs in March was downright alarming… In Europe and America, 30 to 50 percent of recent college graduates are unemployed or underemployed.”

Newsweek’s America:  “In the months since the Lehman debacle, the U.S. has no more lost its ability to grow and innovate than reality-TV producers have lost their ability to coax skanky behavior out of New Jersey’s youth. And despite all the headwinds, there’s no reason the expansion that started in July 2009 can’t go on as long as the previous three, which lasted 73 months, 120 months, and 92 months, respectively. When the definitive history of this period is written, it is possible—no, likely—that this post-bust era will go down not as a time of economic decline, but as one of regeneration.”

Reich’s America:   “Absent real wage gains, that spending pace can’t possibly continue. Consumer savings are down and their debt is up. Consumer confidence dropped last week to a two-month low. The only people left spending are in the top 5 percent, whose stock portfolios have been doing so well they feel even richer. But the top 5 percent can’t pull the entire economy out of the doldrums. Besides, if demand continues to slide the stock market will follow.”

 

ALSO PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM May 5, 2012
Posted in Economics, economy, employment, finance, government, inequality, labor, politics, poverty, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ted Kennedy Asks GOP: “When Does the Greed Stop!”

A furious Senator Ted Kennedy goes on the floor of the Senate in January 2007 to berate Republicans for filibustering a vote on raising the minimum wage (unchanged for ten years) from $5.15 to $7.25 per hour.

Posted in economy, inequality, labor, Republican Party, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Either Way, People Die

BPR Quote of the Day

“‘Terrorism’ is what we call the violence of the weak, and we condemn it;  ‘war’ is what we call the violence of the strong, and we glorify it.”  

Sydney J. Harris (1917-1986, American journalist and columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Daily News) 

Posted in military, Terrorism, war | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Overrated?

Posted in humor | Leave a comment

Stating the Obvious


Let’s Just Say It: The Republicans Are the Problem

By Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein/ Washington Post/ April 27, 2012

Rep. Allen West, a Florida Republican, was recently captured on video asserting that there are “78 to 81” Democrats in Congress who are members of the Communist Party. Of course, it’s not unusual for some renegade lawmaker from either side of the aisle to say something outrageous. What made West’s comment — right out of the McCarthyite playbook of the 1950s — so striking was the almost complete lack of condemnation from Republican congressional leaders or other major party figures, including the remaining presidential candidates.

It’s not that the GOP leadership agrees with West; it is that such extreme remarks and views are now taken for granted.

We have been studying Washington politics and Congress for more than 40 years, and never have we seen them this dysfunctional. In our past writings, we have criticized both parties when we believed it was warranted. Today, however, we have no choice but to acknowledge that the core of the problem lies with the Republican Party.

The GOP has become an insurgent outlier in American politics. It is ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.

When one party moves this far from the mainstream, it makes it nearly impossible for the political system to deal constructively with the country’s challenges.

“Both sides do it” or “There is plenty of blame to go around” are the traditional refuges for an American news media intent on proving its lack of bias, while political scientists prefer generality and neutrality when discussing partisan polarization. Many self-styled bipartisan groups, in their search for common ground, propose solutions that move both sides to the center, a strategy that is simply untenable when one side is so far out of reach.

It is clear that the center of gravity in the Republican Party has shifted sharply to the right. Its once-legendary moderate and center-right legislators in the House and the Senate — think Bob Michel, Mickey Edwards, John Danforth, Chuck Hagel — are virtually extinct.

The post-McGovern Democratic Party, by contrast, while losing the bulk of its conservative Dixiecrat contingent in the decades after the civil rights revolution, has retained a more diverse base. Since the Clinton presidency, it has hewed to the center-left on issues from welfare reform to fiscal policy. While the Democrats may have moved from their 40-yard line to their 25, the Republicans have gone from their 40 to somewhere behind their goal post.

What happened? Of course, there were larger forces at work beyond the realignment of the South. They included the mobilization of social conservatives after the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, the anti-tax movement launched in 1978 by California’s Proposition 13, the rise of conservative talk radio after a congressional pay raise in 1989, and the emergence of Fox News and right-wing blogs. But the real move to the bedrock right starts with two names: Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist.

From the day he entered Congress in 1979, Gingrich had a strategy to create a Republican majority in the House: convincing voters that the institution was so corrupt that anyone would be better than the incumbents, especially those in the Democratic majority. It took him 16 years, but by bringing ethics charges against Democratic leaders; provoking them into overreactions that enraged Republicans and united them to vote against Democratic initiatives; exploiting scandals to create even more public disgust with politicians; and then recruiting GOP candidates around the country to run against Washington, Democrats and Congress, Gingrich accomplished his goal.

Ironically, after becoming speaker, Gingrich wanted to enhance Congress’s reputation and was content to compromise with President Bill Clinton when it served his interests. But the forces Gingrich unleashed destroyed whatever comity existed across party lines, activated an extreme and virulently anti-Washington base — most recently represented by tea party activists — and helped drive moderate Republicans out of Congress. (Some of his progeny, elected in the early 1990s, moved to the Senate and polarized its culture in the same way.)

Norquist, meanwhile, founded Americans for Tax Reform in 1985 and rolled out his Taxpayer Protection Pledge the following year. The pledge, which binds its signers to never support a tax increase (that includes closing tax loopholes), had been signed as of last year by 238 of the 242 House Republicans and 41 of the 47 GOP senators, according to ATR. The Norquist tax pledge has led to other pledges, on issues such as climate change, that create additional litmus tests that box in moderates and make cross-party coalitions nearly impossible. For Republicans concerned about a primary challenge from the right, the failure to sign such pledges is simply too risky.

Today, thanks to the GOP, compromise has gone out the window in Washington. In the first two years of the Obama administration, nearly every presidential initiative met with vehement, rancorous and unanimous Republican opposition in the House and the Senate, followed by efforts to delegitimize the results and repeal the policies. The filibuster, once relegated to a handful of major national issues in a given Congress, became a routine weapon of obstruction, applied even to widely supported bills or presidential nominations. And Republicans in the Senate have abused the confirmation process to block any and every nominee to posts such as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, solely to keep laws that were legitimately enacted from being implemented. (Continued Here)

Thomas E. Mann is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and Norman J. Ornstein is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. This essay is adapted from their book “It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism,” which will be available Tuesday.
Boldface added by BPR Editor
Posted in Democratic Party, government, media, politics, Republican Party | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Don’t Look Behind the Curtain

Posted in government, law, politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Two Multi-National Corporations and a Voter

BPR Quote of the Day

“Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.”

James Bovard

(Bovard is a libertarian writer and lecturer.)

Posted in Democratic Party, elections, government, Quotations, Republican Party | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

From Womb to Tomb Without Any Help

BPR Quote of the Day

“America: A country in which it has gotten too expensive to go to college, which is the only way to qualify for a decent job, which you need to get health care, which you need to stay alive.”

Arlen Grossman

Posted in economy, Education, employment, health care, inequality, labor, poverty, Quotations | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Millions of Americans Suffering From OLS

OBAMA LETDOWN SYNDROME (OLS): NO CURE ON THE HORIZON 

by Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

Do you feel Angry? Frustrated?  Cynical? Hopeless?  If your politics lean liberal/progressive, you are not alone with these nagging symptoms. You may be suffering from Obama Letdown Syndrome (OLS).

Obama Letdown Syndrome emerged soon after the inauguration of President Barack Obama on January 20, 2009.  From the November election until then, progressive Democrats appeared excited, hopeful, even giddy at times. If you fell into that political category, you likely noticed a spring in your step, a smile on your face, a warm feeling that hope and change were imminent.

For eight long years you endured BSS (Bush Shock Syndrome),  an acute discomfort fueled by pre-emptive overseas wars and uncompromising class warfare against America’s working class and poor.

But the clouds parted and the sun shone through on the November morning when President Barack Obama won the 2008 election. An Obama presidency was positively exhilarating to Democrats: a young likable minority president promising peace and justice, and a fundamental change in the way Washington does business.  Your fantasies turned to visions of daily perp walks by Bush Administration officials and Wall Street banksters, of rich people paying higher taxes, the opportunity for overdue peace dividends, and all kinds of  exciting liberal and progressive scenarios.

image: capitalismisover.com

And then something unexpected happened.  Obama Letdown Syndrome broke out within days after the president moved into the White House. The first symptoms flared up when President Obama picked many questionable appointees for key economic and defense posts. It turned out that many of the same people from the Bush Adminstration who played important roles in the collapse of the world economy and the failed wars and foreign occupations were hired back. Familiar names like Summers, Geithner, Gates and Petraeus jumped aboard the Obama train, causing great worry to supporters expecting real change in government.

Progressives began to suffer intense abdominal pain when it became apparent President Obama not only wasn’t going to suggest single-payer health care reform, he wasn’t even going to fight for a public option. He seemed more interested in keeping the insurance and pharmaceutical companies happy than in meaningful reform.

Like many progressive Democrats, you slept fitfully when Bush Administration torturers were let off the hook, when the Patriot Act was extended, when Wall Street criminals enjoyed their usual obscene bonuses, and when Bush’s tax cuts for the rich were extended. You no doubt developed throbbing OLS headaches when the President began caving in to Republican leaders in Congress, often before negotiations even started. He expanded the Afghanistan War, failed to close Guantanamo Bay, increased drone strikes in more countries, ignored constitutionally mandated civil liberties, and supported offshore oil drilling and nuclear power plants, giving only lip service to concerns about climate change.

Sometimes you have OLS briefly go into remission whenever the President gives one of his stirring speeches, and you tell yourself, now he’s starting to get it.  But invariably the symptoms return with a vengeance when his actions once again fail to live up to his rhetoric.

OLS turns chronic when the realization strikes your brain: Barack Obama is not a courageous fighter for progressive causes. It worsens when you figure out he is just one more in a line of Democratic Party presidents and politicians whose paramount goal is to get elected and stay in power.  If you were expecting him to wage war against wealthy corporate interests and heartless Republicans, and fight to restore the American Dream….well, you should know by now it isn’t going to happen.

What is the prognosis for Obama Letdown Syndrome? Sadly, no cure is on the horizon. His populist rhetoric will gin up as the next election draws nearer, but the results, win or lose, will undoubtably disappoint you. When the dust settles after November, 2012, the real power in America will still reside in the boardrooms of giant multi-national corporations and in the offshore accounts of multi-millionaires and billionaires. A cure could conceivably come in the form of an uprising among the 99 Percent, an Occupy America movement that can’t be ignored by the owners of America, but that is a long shot.

It is more likely OLS will continue (perhaps under a different name). If radical change does not come, American liberals/progressives will have to learn to live with this debilitating infliction–and hope it will be covered under what’s left of ObamaCare.

ALSO PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM April 29, 2012
Posted in Afghanistan, Barack Obama, civil liberties, Democratic Party, Economics, economy, elections, foreign policy, government, inequality, Occupy, politics, protests, Republican Party, taxes, Wall Street, war | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments