Not Your Father’s Car Commercial…..

Posted in humor, lifestyle, media | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

UGANDA? ZAMBIA? KENYA?

Where To Escape the Individual Mandate (Hint: Not Canada)

By Amy Bingham/ ABC News/ June 30, 2012

Good Luck Finding A Developed Country That Has No Individual Mandate

The Supreme Court’s ruling upholding Obama’s health care law on Thursday made some people so disillusioned with the United States that they posted on Facebook and Twitter that they were jumping ship and moving to Canada.

But Canada’s health care system makes Obamacare look like the poster child for free market capitalism. Canada not only has an individual mandate requiring all residents to buy health insurance, but that insurance is government-run.

So if not America’s northern neighbor, where can people looking for a reprieve from a government that will soon force them to buy health insurance turn?

Heading south to Mexico won’t work. Nearly the entire Mexican population gets their health care from a Medicaid-like system funded by the government.

Europe isn’t an option either. The health care systems in Britain, Denmark, Spain, Norway and Sweden are all funded by taxes much in the same way as public schools or the police force.

Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Sweden all mandate that residents buy private insurance and those insurance companies are non-profits that are required to cover everyone and are highly regulated, giving governments the control to manage costs.

Even Singapore has a policy similar to Obamacare’s individual mandate, requiring residents to set aside part of their incomes in personal savings accounts, which can be used to pay for health care.

“As far as I can tell, there’s not really any developed country that doesn’t have either a government-provided system or a mandate,” said Michael Tanner, a senior fellow at the Libertarian Cato Institute who studies health policy.

Even with the individual mandate, the United States still has one of the most privately-run health care systems in the world, said Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations.

“We were very exceptional,” Huang said of the U.S. “Among industrialized countries we were the only one that adopted the market-based system.”

So where can people disillusioned by ‘Obamacare’ turn to find a country whose health care system has less government involvement than the United States?

“I can’t name one,” said Robin Osborn, vice president and director of The Commonwealth Fund’s International Program in Health Policy. “It’d be more likely a third world country.”

Haung suggested “maybe sub-Saharan Africa.”

Boldface added by BPR Editor
Posted in Barack Obama, economy, government, health care, law, medicine, politics, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Early Problems With “Enhanced Interrogation”

Posted in civil liberties, humor | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Visible Hand of the Market

Posted in Economics, economy, employment, inequality, Justice, labor, law, poverty, race, taxes, Wall Street | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Poll : What Is Most Important to You in Choosing a President?

Posted in Barack Obama, elections, Mitt Romney, politics, poll | Tagged , , , | 10 Comments

Who Cares What the People Want? Certainly Not the Supreme Court

BPR Quotes of the Day

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday struck down Montana’s 100-year-old ban on corporate  money in state and local elections. Reaffirming their horrendous Citizens United decision, the Court eliminated all restrictions on campaign spending by Montana corporations. The original law passed in 1912 was a response to election interference by the state’s “copper kings.” Prior to the ban, Mark Twain wrote of one copper czar, “He is said to have bought legislatures and judges as other men buy food and raiment. By his example he has so excused and so sweetened corruption that in Montana it no longer has an offensive smell.” –The BPR Editor

Posted in elections, government, Quotations, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

HOW SAD WE ONLY HAVE ONE BERNIE SANDERS

The American People Are Angry

By Bernie Sanders/ OpEdNews.com/ June 28, 2012

The American people are angry.  They are angry that they are being forced to live through the worst recession in our lifetimes — with sky-high unemployment, with millions of people losing their homes and their life savings.  They are angry that they will not have a decent retirement, that they can’t afford to send their children to college, that they can’t afford health insurance and that, in some cases, they can’t even buy the food they need to adequately feed their families. 

They are angry because they know that this recession was not caused by the middle class and working families of this country. It was not caused by the teachers, firefighters and police officers and their unions who are under attack all over the country. It was not caused by c onstruction workers, factory workers, nurses or childcare workers.

This recession was caused by the greed, recklessness, and illegal behavior on Wall Street.  And, what makes people furious is that Wall Street still has not learned its lessons.  Instead of investing in the job-creating productive economy providing affordable loans to small and medium-size businesses, the CEOs of the largest financial institutions in this country have created the largest gambling casino in the history of the world.

Four years ago, after spending billions of dollars to successfully fight for the deregulation of Wall Street, the CEOs of the big banks — JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and the others — went on a losing streak.  The enormous bets they made on worthless, complex, and exotic financial instruments went bad, and they stuck the American people with the bill.

Wall Street received the largest taxpayer bailout in the history of the world.  But it was not just the $700 billion that Congress approved through the TARP program.  As a result of an independent audit that I requested in the Dodd-Frank bill by the non-partisan Government Accountability Office, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided a jaw-dropping $16 trillion in virtually zero-interest loans to every major financial institution in this country, large corporations, foreign central banks throughout the world, and some of the wealthiest people in this country.

And, instead of using this money to provide affordable loans to small businesses, instead of putting this money back into the job-creating productive economy, what have they done?  They have gone back to their days of running the largest gambling casino in the world.  In other words, they have learned nothing.

The American people are angry because they see the great middle class of this country collapsing, poverty increasing and the gap between the very rich and everyone else grow wider.  They are angry because they see this great country, which so many of our veterans fought for and died for, becoming an oligarchy — a nation where our economic and political life are controlled by a handful of billionaire families.

In the United States today, we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s.  Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America – 150 million people.

Today, the six heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune own more wealth than the bottom 30 percent.

Today, the top 1 percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom 60 percent owns less than 2 percent.  Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 0.3 percent of the wealth of the country.

According to a new study from the Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007 to 2010.  That’s the equivalent of wiping out 18 years of savings for the average middle class family.

The distribution of income is even worse.  If you can believe it, the last study on this subject showed that in 2010, 93 percent of all new income created from the previous year went to the top one percent, while the bottom 99 percent of people had the privilege of enjoying the remaining 7 percent. In other words, the rich are getting much richer while almost everyone else is falling behind.

Not only is this inequality of wealth and income morally grotesque, it is bad economic policy.  If working families are deeply in debt, and have little or no income to spend on goods and services, how can we expand the economy and create the millions of jobs we desperately need?  There is a limit as to how many yachts, mansions, limos and fancy jewelry the super-rich can buy.  We need to put income into the hands of working families.      (Continued Here)

Bernie Sanders is the Independent U.S. Senator from Vermont.

Some Boldface added by BPR Editor
Posted in Democratic Party, Economics, economy, elections, employment, government, inequality, labor, politics, poverty, protest, Republican Party, taxes, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nothing Here, Move On….

Posted in humor, media | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Human Rights: It’s So Last Decade

In a NY Times Op-Ed, Jimmy Carter calls out the U.S. government (while carefully omitting President Obama’s name) for it’s worsening human rights record. The former American president and Nobel Peace Prize winner, clearly unafraid to speak his mind (Carter has criticized every one of his successors at one time or another) condemns the many violations of the U.S. Constitution and international treaties by the Bush and Obama administrations since September 11, 2001. We need many more fearless critics like Carter. — The BPR Editor

A Cruel and Unusual Record

By Jimmy Carter/ New York Times / June 24. 2012

THE United States is abandoning its role as the global champion of human rights.

Revelations that top officials are targeting people to be assassinated abroad, including American citizens, are only the most recent, disturbing proof of how far our nation’s violation of human rights has extended. This development began after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and has been sanctioned and escalated by bipartisan executive and legislative actions, without dissent from the general public. As a result, our country can no longer speak with moral authority on these critical issues.

While the country has made mistakes in the past, the widespread abuse of human rights over the last decade has been a dramatic change from the past. With leadership from the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted in 1948 as “the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.” This was a bold and clear commitment that power would no longer serve as a cover to oppress or injure people, and it established equal rights of all people to life, liberty, security of person, equal protection of the law and freedom from torture, arbitrary detention or forced exile.

The declaration has been invoked by human rights activists and the international community to replace most of the world’s dictatorships with democracies and to promote the rule of law in domestic and global affairs. It is disturbing that, instead of strengthening these principles, our government’s counterterrorism policies are now clearly violating at least 10 of the declaration’s 30 articles, including the prohibition against “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

Recent legislation has made legal the president’s right to detain a person indefinitely on suspicion of affiliation with terrorist organizations or “associated forces,” a broad, vague power that can be abused without meaningful oversight from the courts or Congress (the law is currently being blocked by a federal judge). This law violates the right to freedom of expression and to be presumed innocent until proved guilty, two other rights enshrined in the declaration.

In addition to American citizens’ being targeted for assassination or indefinite detention, recent laws have canceled the restraints in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to allow unprecedented violations of our rights to privacy through warrantless wiretapping and government mining of our electronic communications. Popular state laws permit detaining individuals because of their appearance, where they worship or with whom they associate.

Despite an arbitrary rule that any man killed by drones is declared an enemy terrorist, the death of nearby innocent women and children is accepted as inevitable. After more than 30 airstrikes on civilian homes this year in Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai has demanded that such attacks end, but the practice continues in areas of Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen that are not in any war zone. We don’t know how many hundreds of innocent civilians have been killed in these attacks, each one approved by the highest authorities in Washington. This would have been unthinkable in previous times.

These policies clearly affect American foreign policy. Top intelligence and military officials, as well as rights defenders in targeted areas, affirm that the great escalation in drone attacks has turned aggrieved families toward terrorist organizations, aroused civilian populations against us and permitted repressive governments to cite such actions to justify their own despotic behavior.

Meanwhile, the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, now houses 169 prisoners. About half have been cleared for release, yet have little prospect of ever obtaining their freedom. American authorities have revealed that, in order to obtain confessions, some of the few being tried (only in military courts) have been tortured by waterboarding more than 100 times or intimidated with semiautomatic weapons, power drills or threats to sexually assault their mothers. Astoundingly, these facts cannot be used as a defense by the accused, because the government claims they occurred under the cover of “national security.” Most of the other prisoners have no prospect of ever being charged or tried either.

At a time when popular revolutions are sweeping the globe, the United States should be strengthening, not weakening, basic rules of law and principles of justice enumerated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But instead of making the world safer, America’s violation of international human rights abets our enemies and alienates our friends.

As concerned citizens, we must persuade Washington to reverse course and regain moral leadership according to international human rights norms that we had officially adopted as our own and cherished throughout the years.

Jimmy Carter, the 39th president, is the founder of the Carter Center and the recipient of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize.

 Boldface added by BPR Editor

Posted in Afghanistan, Barack Obama, civil liberties, foreign policy, government, Justice, law, Pakistan, Terrorism | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Morally Corrupt But Brilliant Secret Strategy of the Military/Industrial/Homeland Security Complex

by Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

“War is a racket… easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious… It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives….It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.”

Major General Smedley Butler, U.S. Marines,  from his book War Is a Racket, (1935) 

The Washington Post ran a story recently with this headline:  “In Yemen, U.S. Airstrikes Breed Anger, and Sympathy For Al-Qaeda.” The story told how “an escalating campaign of U.S. drone strikes” have driven tribesmen in Yemen over to the side of  al-Qaeda-linked militants. Such blowback shouldn’t be a surprise–some say we are creating more terrorists than we are killing. If true, then why are we waging drone warfare more often and in more places than ever before?

The answer may be found in Naomi Klein’s 2007 book, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism,  in which she provides numerous examples of free-market fundamentalists swooping in on disaster areas all over the world, from Chile to Iraq to New Orleans and transforming tragic situations to their  ideological and financial advantage. Ground Zero in New York City provides another instructive example.

politifake.org

Powerful and influential segments of American society have profited immensely from the “War on Terror” since September 11, 2001. Trillions of dollars and millions of jobs in defense and homeland security have spun off from this never-ending “war.”  The news media is another beneficiary, enjoying a spike in ratings whenever it covers stories of terror threats, real or imagined, as well as armed conflict around the world. Right-wing politicians also benefit, intimidating opponents and winning votes with hawkish rhetoric and scare stories.

The fight against “terrorism” has boosted job security and profits big-time for the military-industrial-national security complex. The government can’t spend enough on weapons and homeland security, never having to fear opposition from either the Republican or Democratic parties.

A very few daring souls have suggested the threat of terrorism might be an exaggeration, a scam, or even a hoax. A case can be made that 9/11 was a well-planned aberration cleverly crafted by a relatively weak third-world organization without backup plans. The George W. Bush Administration used the terrorist trauma to start two wars and shred important parts of our Constitution. The First Ten Amendments might now be properly called “The Bill of Limited Rights.”

Is the “War on Terrorism” a scam? Sounds far-fetched, but not unprecedented. Just look back on our own history: “Remember the Maine!” (Spanish-American War)…The Gulf of Tonkin (Vietnam)…WMDs (Iraq)…all false or questionable scenarios leading to unnecessary and costly wars.

Look how our country has changed since 2001. Where once we had the CIA (foreign) and the FBI (domestic), there are now, at last glance, 17 intelligence agencies. A 2010 Washington Post investigation reported “some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States…An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.”

Clearly, a lot of powerful and influential people are heavily invested in the national defense and homeland security gravy train. We are assured “The War on Terror” will end when the threat of terror is eliminated–which, when you think about it, translates to “never.”

 

bilderberg.org

Which brings me to the Morally Corrupt But Brilliant (and Extremely Lucrative) Secret Strategy of the Military/Industrial/National Security Complex:

(1) Send American soldiers, secret agents and/or unmanned drones, to target suspected militants. Inevitably we will sometimes kill the wrong people. We call it collateral damage, the rest of the world calls it killing innocent civilians.

(2) These terrorist acts on our part anger the citizens of these countries, and drive some of them into the arms of al-Qaeda and their wannabe affiliates. We end up helping recruit potential terrorists. Like the bumper sticker says: “We Are Creating Enemies Faster Than We Can Kill Them.”

(3) To combat the “increased threat” from these  amateur “terrorists,”  the U.S. funnels billions of dollars to government agencies and private contractors to devise bigger and newer ways to kill militants and spy on everybody (American citizens included).  In the process, more enemies are produced, leading to an inevitable  expansion of the “War on Terror.” (back to #1)

There you have it: a brilliant, morally corrupt, and profitable plan to inspire potential terrorists, churn out new military/national security jobs and weaponry, and maximize the obscene wealth of the well-connected corporations providing them.

When it all shakes out, we are left with the unfortunate victims of this duplicitous plan: innocent civilians killed and maimed abroad and, right here at home, Americans  struggling to stay above water in a failing and unforgiving economy.

ALSO PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM June 28, 2012
Posted in civil liberties, Economics, economy, foreign policy, government, military, politics, Terrorism, war | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments