When was Bribery Legalized in America?

By Thom Hartmann/ HartmannReport.com/ November 15, 2023

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” — Frédéric Bastiat (French economist)

Virtually every crisis America is facing right now is either caused or exacerbated by the corruption of our nation’s third branch of government.

A branch of government — the Supreme Court — that this week laid out one of the most absurd charades in its history, pretending to do something about their own corruption and utter lack of ethics with a sham “Code of Conduct.”

They are responsible for our crises of gun violence, the drug epidemic, homelessness, political gridlock, our slow response to the climate emergency, a looming crisis for Social Security and Medicare, the situation on our southern border, even the lack of affordable drugs, insurance, and healthcare.

All track back to a handful of Supreme Court justices who’ve sold their votes to billionaires in exchange for extravagant vacations, luxury yachts and motorhomes, private jet travel, speaking fees, homes, tuition, and participation in exclusive clubs and billionaire networks that bar the rest of us from entry.

— America is the only country in the world that terrorizes its children with active shooter drills in schools, the only country where the leading cause of childhood deaths is bullets, and the only country where mass shootings are a near-everyday occurrence.

Why do Republicans in Congress block every effort to do something and save America’s children’s lives? Because they’re owned with big money contributions and campaign spending by the NRA and gun manufacturers.

And why is that legal? Because five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court — several already on the take themselves, although nobody knew it at the time — ruled in Citizens United that, “[W]e now conclude that independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.” 

— The Sackler family spent years making billions by addicting and ultimately killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, but to this day not a single member of that psychopathic family has seen the inside of a prison cell. Why? Because they bought off multiple politicians, including (according to reporting from The Intercept) the Republican Attorneys General Association and the Democratic Governors Association.

There was a time when these bribes — and the opioid deaths they cover up — would have been a felony; today they’re routine because corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court legalized political bribery.

— Why isn’t America reacting more rapidly to the extreme weather events that are killing Americans from coast-to-coast (and in Hawaii and Alaska)? Why does almost every Republican in Congress refuse to acknowledge basic climate science and instead works to maintain the $600 billion annual subsidies for, and massive profits of, the fossil fuel industry?

Because they’re on the take from that very industry. Courtesy of Citizens United and its predecessors written into law by five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court.

— Medicare is being ripped off to the tune of over $140 billion a year, and millions of Americans who bought into the Medicare Advantage privatized insurance scam are routinely denied care, because the insurance industry was able to help write George W. Bush’s 2003 legislation “modernizing” Medicare.

Why does Congress tolerate this? Because they’re on the take from that very industry. Courtesy of Citizens United and its predecessors voted into law by corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court.

— Cancer-causing pesticides, food additives, PFAS chemicals, and microplastics lace our environment and food supply, creating a cancer crisis unknown in Europe where these are all banned or tightly regulated. Why here? Because Congress refuses to act as long as the industries creating these problems can legally continue their campaign donations and other bribes.

— Republicans in Congress (and Nikki Haley) are pushing hard for a new “Catfood Commission” to figure out ways to cut Social Security benefits and raise the retirement age. Speaker Johnson announced yesterday afternoon that he’s creating the commission over the Thanksgiving holiday and they’ll hold their first hearings in two weeks.

Why would they defy an American public that loves the program just to avoid asking billionaires to pay the same Social Security tax rate as bus drivers?

Because they’re on the take from the billionaires who don’t want to pay their taxes, and the banks that hope the Catfood Commission will develop “Social Security Advantage” as a way of privatizing the system. Courtesy of Citizens United and its predecessors voted into law by corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court.

— At the same time the pharmaceutical industry is enjoying the largest profits in its history, millions of Americans are cutting pills in half or even going without essential medications because they can’t afford the price-gouging that’s routine in the drug business.

Why won’t Congress act? Because they’re on the take from that very industry. Courtesy of Citizens United and its predecessors voted into law by corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court.

— Every other developed country in the world has figured out how to give their students quality public school and free or inexpensive college educations. Here in America, private for-profit and religious schools are getting hundreds of billions from Republican-controlled Red states, decimating our public schools, while tens of millions of young people can’t start families or small businesses because they’re crushed by student debt that doesn’t exist anywhere else in the developed world.

Why does America tolerate this? Because the banking industry is making billions in profits off student loans every month and shares some of that lucre with members of Congress, a process legalized by five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court.

— A private for-profit prison industry intervenes in every effort to update our immigration and asylum systems as well as attempts to refocus our criminal justice system toward rehabilitation. They can do this by buying off mostly Republican politicians because corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court legalized political bribery.

— Homelessness stalks America as rent prices skyrocket while more homes remain empty — investment properties bought by foreign and Wall Street speculators — than there are homeless people in our nation. Other countries have largely solved their homelessness crises, but here in America all systemic efforts are paralyzed by big money from the real estate and hedge fund industries.

This is legal because corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court sold out our country to the wealthy interests that have been courting them since the Reagan era.

For over two decades, Clarence Thomas and his wife have been accepting millions in free luxury vacations, tuition for their adopted son, a home for his mother, private jet and megayacht travel, and entrance to rarified clubs. 

Sam Alito is also on the gravy train, and there are questions about how Brett Kavanaugh managed to pay off his credit cards and gambling debts. John Roberts’ wife has made over $10 million from law firms with business before the court; Neil Gorsuch got a sweetheart real estate deal; Amy Coney Barrett refuses to recuse herself from cases involving her father’s oil company.

None of this is illegal because when five corrupt Republicans on the Court legalized members of Congress taking bribes they legalized that same behavior for themselves.

This week, the Supreme Court tried to put a tiny fig leaf over the bloated, corpulent, naked corpse of their own obscene corruption. They call it a “Supreme Court Code of Conduct,” but it’s a pathetic joke.

It contains no enforcement provisions, no way for anybody to file complaints or blow the whistle, no consequences for violations, no system for investigations, no mechanism for informing the public, no specifics about what “corrupt behavior” means, and no penalties whatsoever even when behavior is so clearly corrupt it’s obvious to everybody.

At best, it’s a PR stunt; at worst, it’s the latest example of how arrogant the six Republicans running the Court have become about their own “right” to stay on the take and extend that largesse to every Republican politician in the country.

They’re responding, of course, to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s efforts on the Senate Judiciary Committee to subpoena a few of the billionaires and political fixers who’ve been grooming Republican justices for decades. He wanted to start by questioning Harlan Crow and Leonard Leo.

Republicans on the Judiciary Committee, who are just fine with having six corrupt Republicans on the  Supreme Court so long as their corruption works to the GOP’s advantage, slapped 88 proposed amendments onto Whitehouse’s subpoena request, successfully blocking his efforts for the moment. 

Every one of those Republican senators has received millions in billionaire and corporate money, along with their own “right” to enjoy the private jets and mega-yachts of their morbidly rich “supporters.”

So how is it that if you bribe a store clerk or a bank teller you go to prison, but if you bribe a politician, you get a tax break? When was bribery of politicians and Supreme Court justices legalized in America?

There was a time, after all, when politicians — both Democrats and Republicans — passed laws that conformed to the desires of the majority of Americans instead of the special interests. 

From the end of the Republican Great Depression right up until the Reagan Revolution — from 1933 to 1981 — the American middle class had about a half-century of uninterrupted political and economic progress.

— Democrats passed the right to unionize, which built the American middle class, the world’s first. They passed unemployment insurance, the right to unionize, and workplace safety rules to protect workers.

— Social Security largely ended poverty among the elderly, and Medicare provided them with health security.

— A top income tax rate between 74% and 91% throughout that period kept wages strong for working people and prevented the corrosive wealth inequality we see today. We didn’t get our first billionaire until after the Reagan revolution dropped those top tax rates down to 27 percent.

— We built colleges that were free or affordable, gleaming new nonprofit hospitals, the world’s finest system of public schools, and roads, bridges, rail, and airports from coast to coast.

— We cleaned up the environment with the Environmental Protection Agency, cleaned up politics with the Federal Elections Commission, cleaned up corporate backroom deals with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We outlawed banks from gambling with our deposits via the Glass-Steagall law.

But it all came to a screeching halt with the Reagan Revolution. How and why?

Instead of building the middle class, Reaganomics gutted it. Instead of educating young people, it indebted them. Instead of supporting workers, the GOP’s “right to work for less” scheme took away their dignity and their pay.

Today both our nation’s infrastructure and our workforce are in shambles because of 40 years of disinvestment and neglect.

What made that possible?  Why did that happen?

It all comes back to legalized political bribery.

Our modern era of legalized political bribery began in the decade after Richard Nixon put Lewis Powell — the tobacco lawyer who wrote the infamous 1971 “Powell Memo” outlining how billionaires and corporations could take over America — on the Supreme Court in 1972.

In the 1976 Buckley v. Valeo decision, the Court ruled that political money wasn’t just cash: they claimed it’s also “free speech” protected by the First Amendment that guarantees your right to speak out on political issues.

In the 200 preceding years — all the way back to the American Revolution of 1776 — no politician or credible political scientist had ever proposed that giving money to a politician in exchange for favors or votes was anything other than simple bribery.

The “originalists” on the Supreme Court, however, claimed to be channeling the Founders of this nation, particularly those who wrote the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, when they said that “money was the same thing as free speech.” In that claim, Republicans on the Court were lying through their teeth.

In a letter to Samuel Kerchival in 1816, President and author of the Declaration of Independence Thomas Jefferson explicitly laid it out:

“Those seeking profits, were they given total freedom, would not be the ones to trust to keep government pure and our rights secure. Indeed, it has always been those seeking wealth who were the source of corruption in government.”

In this, he was making the same argument that the Framers of Pennsylvania made when writing their constitution in 1776. As Kevin Phillips notes in his masterpiece book Wealth and Democracy: A Political History of the American Rich, a Sixteenth Article of the revolutionary-era Pennsylvania Bill of Rights declared:

“An enormous proportion of property vested in a few individuals is dangerous to the rights, and destructive of the common happiness of mankind, and, therefore, every free state hath a right by its laws to discourage the possession of such property.”

But Republicans on the Supreme Court weren’t reading the Founders. They were instead listening to the billionaires who helped get them on the court in the first place. Who had bribed them with position and power and then kept them in their thrall with luxury vacations, “friendship,”and gifts.

Two years after the 1976 Buckley decision, the Republicans on the Supreme Court struck again, this time adding that the “money is speech and can be used to buy politicians” argument applied to corporations as well as to billionaires.  Lewis Powell himself wrote the majority opinion in the 1978 Boston v Bellotti decision.

Justices White, Brennan, and Marshall dissented:

“The special status of corporations has placed them in a position to control vast amounts of economic power which may, if not regulated, dominate not only our economy but the very heart of our democracy, the electoral process.”

But the dissenters lost the vote, and political corruption of everything from local elections to the Supreme Court itself was now virtually assured.

Notice that ruling came down just two years before the Reagan Revolution, when almost all forward progress in America came to a screeching halt.

It’s no coincidence. 

And it’s gotten worse since then, with the Court doubling down in 2010 with Citizens United, overturning hundreds of state and federal “good government” laws dating all the way back to the late 1800s.

Thus, today America has a severe bribery problem.

It’s bizarre that the Court would keep intact anti-bribery laws across every facet of American life except politics, but that’s exactly what they did. Bribery is still illegal in business, it’s illegal in interactions with the police, but according to five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court it’s perfectly legal to bribe politicians.

No other developed country in the world has this problem, which is why every other developed country has a national healthcare system, free or near-free college, and strong unions that maintain a healthy middle class. It’s why they can afford pharmaceuticals, are taking active steps to stop climate change, and don’t fear being shot when they go to school, the theater, or shopping. 

We’re the only major country in the world right now that is experiencing legislative gridlock on this scale. And we’ve been experiencing it for four decades.

This cannot continue. If America is to survive as a democratic republic, we must end the legal bribery of our politicians.

And that starts with the work Sheldon Whitehouse and his Democratic colleagues are doing on the Senate Judiciary Committee to reform the Supreme Court and hold its most corrupt members to account.

Posted in America, Congress, corporations, democracy, Democratic Party, elections, ethics, government, judiciary, politics, Republican Party, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Elections, Polls, Budgets, Speaker Johnson, and More

Another Monday morning Halitics videocast, with lots of political topics for Hal and Arlen to talk about…..

Posted in America, Congress, democracy, Donald Trump, elections, government, media, politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

So Much to Talk About

Posted in America, Congress, democracy, Donald Trump, government, Israel, media, protests | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Read the Entire Second Amendment….

Debate from “West Wing” on why we need sensible gun control laws…….

Posted in America, gun control, politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Politicians With a Sense of Humor

Posted in Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, humor, Joe Biden, political humor, politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Why Didn’t Someone Think of This Before?

Amazing! Two Days Into His New job, and he already has a solution to this horrible problem in America: Prayer! Why Didn’t Anyone Else Think of This?

After mass shooting, new speaker calls for prayer that ‘senseless violence can stop’

Mike Johnson has opposed gun control measures for years, and opined about the role of faith in response to violence

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., prepares to make a statement Thursday on the mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine.
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., prepares to make a statement Thursday on the mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) 

By Michael Macagnone / Roll Call

Posted October 26, 2023 at 4:49pm

  • New Speaker Mike Johnson offered prayer Thursday as response to a mass shooter who killed 18 and injured 13 others in Maine, while any legislation to address gun violence faces an uphill climb under his tenure.

The Louisiana Republican, in his first full day as speaker, made a statement to reporters at the Capitol that the shooting late Wednesday was a “horrific tragedy” but did not take questions.

“This is a dark time in America. We have a lot of problems, and we are hopeful and prayerful,” Johnson said. “Prayer is appropriate at a time like this, that this senseless violence can stop.”

https://da8d0b9024845b992f0d737fb73ea9d6.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

As one of the most conservative Republicans to hold the speakership in modern times, Johnson’s opposition to gun control laws could keep any bills on the issue from reaching the House floor.

That won’t be a change. Earlier this year, under then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Democrats launched an effort through discharge petitions to force floor votes on a series of gun control bills.

None of them have received the signatures of enough members of the chamber to move forward.

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters later Thursday that it’s great to hear calls for thoughts and prayers for the families and victims of the tragedy in Maine, but that Johnson and Republicans can put forth legislation and “help save lives.”

“Obviously, we want them to make sure they know they’re in our thoughts and prayers,” Jean-Pierre said of the families and victims. “But that’s not enough.”

https://da8d0b9024845b992f0d737fb73ea9d6.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

Johnson has opposed gun control measures for years, including a measure passed into law last year that beefed up criminal background checks for those under age 21 for the next decade, created grants for state crisis intervention laws and provided several billion dollars in mental health and school security funding.

During floor debate on that measure, Johnson criticized the legislation as unconstitutional and reiterated many statements he made on a podcast with his wife that blamed America’s violent crime problem on a lack of faith.

“America’s problem is not guns. America’s problem is a heart problem,” Johnson said during the floor debate.

During that podcast with his wife, Kelly Johnson, he interviewed Pastor Y. J. Jimenez, who had a congregation near an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, where a shooter killed 19 students and two teachers in May 2022.

During the podcast, Johnson emphasized the importance of turning to faith in response to the violence.

https://da8d0b9024845b992f0d737fb73ea9d6.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

“I’m a public official and when I say, ‘We are praying for someone,’ you know, those who don’t believe criticize us for that as though it is not important, but it is important,” Johnson said.

Johnson said that young men frequently feel isolated in modern society, made worse by the years of the pandemic where “we sort of put them away for a couple of years and they sort of sat around and played violent video games and the bitterness inside of them turned to rage.”

“We’re dealing now with the inevitable results of decades of secular humanist ideology and the rise of moral relativism and the marginalization of people of faith and the erosion of the rule of law,” Johnson said.

Johnson said that has “come together in the sort of toxic soup we have in the culture” and that “these things are so tragic, but they are really not that surprising when you consider what we have been doing for the last 60 or 70 years in this country.”

During the podcast he called discussions of gun control “inevitable” following the Uvalde shooting and said his “gun-grabbing colleagues” in the Democratic Party had overstepped by proposing a wide variety of gun control measures following the shooting.

During that Democrat-led legislative push for a renewed assault weapon ban, Johnson offered an amendment that would have created an exemption for employees of crisis pregnancy centers, which he argued had been targeted following the Supreme Court ruling that overturned the constitutional right to abortion. Democrats voted down that amendment.

However, Johnson’s stint as speaker does little to shift the long-standing partisan gridlock on gun control legislation.

Numerous members on both sides of the aisle said Thursday they would try to restart bipartisan talks, but quickly acknowledged that political reality.

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., one of the Republicans who backed the 2022 law and has sponsored several bipartisan gun control measures, said the filibuster in the closely divided Senate presents a greater challenge to passing legislation.

“The House is not the problem. It’s the Senate. We have the votes in the House. They don’t have the votes in the Senate,” Fitzpatrick said, pointing to measures he has backed, such as so-called red flag laws and universal background checks, that the other chamber has not taken up.

https://da8d0b9024845b992f0d737fb73ea9d6.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

“So I think I think realistically, this stuff is gonna have to start in the Senate and be taken up in the House because everything we’ve said to them has never been voted on,” Fitzpatrick said.

One of the Republican backers of the 2022 law, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, said Thursday that it may be too soon to look at changing the law in response to the shooting Wednesday in Lewiston, Maine. He pointed out that law has not yet been fully implemented and pointed to news reports that the alleged shooter in Lewiston had been committed to a mental institution before embarking on the shooting.

“I’m not sure what law we could pass that would address this because it looks like he was illegally in possession of a firearm in the first place. Sometimes people just don’t care what the laws are,” Cornyn said.

Sen. Christopher S. Murphy, D-Conn., one of the lead negotiators on the bipartisan package that passed last Congress told reporters that he was open to bipartisan negotiations but didn’t expect there would be much in the offing.

“I’m going to talk to [Maine Sen. Susan] Collins, you know, after she comes back from the weekend, see if there’s any potential common ground, but we’re probably gonna just have to win some more elections,” Murphy said.

Posted in America, crime, gun control, law enforcement | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Without the Infrastructure of Democracy, America Will Slide First Into Oligarchy and Then Racism

Voters who believe in democracy, a free press & a public education committed to honest inquiry & intellectual integrity must also step up and let their reps how important these things are to them…

By Thom Hartmann/ HartmannReport.com/ October 23, 2023

For far too many years, Americans have made the mistake of assuming that our republican democracy will be safe as long as we elect competent and well-intentioned politicians as leaders. 

Sadly, that’s like thinking your surgeon, who is very good at what she does, will do a wonderful job even though the hospital can no longer provide her with sterile instruments or running water. 

The reality is that democracies depend on a particular type of infrastructure to function properly. Without that infrastructure, they rapidly slide first into oligarchy and then into fascism. The two most recent examples are Russia and Hungary, although America is well down the road herself.

Recognizing the need for these core infrastructure elements to sustain democracy, neofascists within the GOP and the Supreme Court have been busily deconstructing them for the past 40 years, leading us directly to today’s crisis.

The three core pillars that hold up democratic republics are a vibrant and free press, trustworthy electoral systems, and academic independence. Which is why Republicans have been trying to destroy all three.

In Russia, for example, the word is “dzherimendering.” In the months before elections are held in that country, the government re-draws the maps for political districts to make sure Putin and his party maintain majority control of the parliament (Duma). It’s a trick they brag they learned from Americans.

It’s pretty much the same in Hungary, as Project Syndicate notes:

“After Fidesz won its first supermajority in 2010, it changed the electoral law unilaterally to boost its own future results (through gerrymandering and new rules awarding extra seats for big wins in individual districts). With these changes in place, Fidesz retained its supermajority in 2014, even though it received 8% less of the vote than it had in 2010.

“Changing the rules has since become the party’s modus operandi. Its amendments to the electoral law now number in the hundreds; the latest were adopted just months ago. Owing to the electoral system’s skewed rules, Fidesz has secured 68% of parliamentary seats with 53% of the vote.”

And Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party was only able to get 53% of the vote by similarly rigging the media. His government has taken over their public broadcasting equivalents of NPR and PBS, so they sing Orbán’s praises 24/7.

And, like in Russia, the commercial media has been almost entirely taken over by Hungarian oligarchs made rich by sweetheart government deals: almost every radio and TV station in Hungary today is broadcasting the Hungarian equivalent of Fox “News,” all deifying Orbán and his billionaire buddies who run the country.

Education is similarly under the control of the Russian and Hungarian governments. Any professor in Russia who dares discuss politics, race, or queer issues will find himself shipped off to a prison camp. In Budapest, the progressive Christian Central European University fled Hungary in the face of growing threats of violence against progressive religious organizations, a ban on classes, and the tight embrace of rightwing churches by the government.  Its rector, Michael Ignatieff, said:

“There’s just no doubt but that this is organized as a way of saying that ‘Christianity’ means ‘white conservative Europe’. It’s a trope. Say the world ‘Christian’ and it says everything else that you want to say.”

Thus, it surprised nobody when wannabee fascist strongman Ron DeSantis seized control of Florida’s flagship liberal arts school, the New College, and replaced a third of its staff, rewrote its classes to eliminate references to African-American history or white race-based crimes, and packed the incoming student body with people on athletic scholarships.

These are also examples of ways Republicans are trying to destroy the infrastructure of democracy here.

Which is why just keeping an insurrection-supporting traitor like Jim Jordan out of the House speakership isn’t going to save American democracy. 

While it’s important to keep toxic politicians out of office or positions of power, without elections that are not gerrymandered and thus truly reflect the will of the voters; politically independent media; and a vibrant university system to educate the next generation of American leaders, we’re inexorably heading down the path that Russia and Hungary have trod.

And it’s not like Republicans and their wealthy colleagues are trying to hide it.

When Orbán hosted the CPAC Republican fascist-fest this May in Budapest, the Hungarian “soft fascism” strongman president told the audience, to a standing ovation:

“Hungary is actually an incubator where experiments are done on the future of conservative policies. Hungary is the place where we didn’t just talk about defeating the progressives and liberals and causing a conservative Christian political turn, but we actually did it.”

The key, Orbán told his American fascist fanboys, was for the government and the party’s billionaires to take control of the media using the same strategy he and Putin used to hand most industrial and media operations to their favored oligarchs.

Orbán has handed government contracts to his favored few, elevating an entire group of pro-Orbán businessmen (it appears all are men) who have now seized almost complete control of that nation’s economy. Those who opposed him have lost their businesses, been forced to sell their companies, and often fled the country.

This is why virtually all of Hungary’s press is now in the hands of oligarchs and corporations loyal to Orbán, with hard-right talk radio and television across the country singing his praises daily. Progressive media is functionally banned. Billboards and social media proclaim Orbán’s patriotism everywhere. 

He told the American CPAC conference in Budapest last year they should do the same in America when Republicans next seize control of the US government:

“Have your own media,” he said. “It’s the only way to point out the insanity of the progressive left. The problem is that the western media is adjusted to the leftist viewpoint. Those who taught reporters in universities already had progressive leftist principles.”

He added:

“Of course, the GOP has its media allies but they can’t compete with the mainstream liberal media. My friend Tucker Carlson is the only one who puts himself out there. His show is the most popular. What does it mean? It means programs like his should be broadcasted day and night. Or, as you say, 24/7.”

After his 2022 speech was publicized in the US, many American media outlets were banned from attending CPAC 2023 in Budapest. As Vice News reported:

“Besides VICE News, journalists from Rolling Stone, Vox Media, and the New Yorker were turned away from the conference on Thursday, despite repeated assurances from the American Conservative Union that access would be provided. Journalists from other non-Hungarian media outlets, including the Guardian and Associated Press, tweeted that they had also been denied accreditation, despite months of requests.”

His media allies are now reaching out to purchase media across the rest of Europe and inviting American rightwing groups to Hungary to help spread his racist, “soft fascist” message. Tucker Carlson took him up on his invitation last year, broadcasting his poison directly into American homes from his presidential palace.

In his opening comments before Orbán took the stage, CPAC chairman (and accused sexual harasser) Matt Schlapp echoed Orbán’s strategy, as the Associated Press noted:

“In opening comments, CPAC chairman Matt Schlapp said that CPAC in the U.S. had decided to ‘go Hungarian’ in their approach to the media, deciding for themselves ‘who is a journalist and who is not a journalist’ when determining which outlets to allow into their events.”

But journalism isn’t the only institution fascists want to tear down.

Orbán recently began dismantling the Hungarian Science Academy, replacing or simply firing scientists and professors who acknowledge climate change, which he has called “left-wing trickery made up by Barack Obama.”

Here in the US, rightwingers started building their political empires with American oligarchs and their giant corporations that wanted to become even more massive. They were willing to pay politicians nearly anything to get the job done, and, since five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court had legalized political bribery in 1978, that meant billions.

Following massive campaign contributions from wannabe monopolies, in 1983 President Reagan ordered the DOJ, SEC, and FTC to essentially stop enforcing America’s anti-trust laws. At that time, every mall and downtown in America was filled with locally-owned businesses and there were over 10,000 independent media operations in America. Most radio and television stations had a single, local owner, as did most newspapers.

In 1987 he ended enforcement of the FCC’s Fairness Doctrine and in 1996 Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that both gave immunity to social media from the content they carry (making Mark Zuckerberg a billionaire) and largely ended restrictions on the number of radio stations, TV stations, and newspapers a single company could own.

Rush Limbaugh started the year after Reagan killed the fairness doctrine; Air America died when the giant radio monopoly Clear Channel, recently acquired by Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital, began flipping their stations to sports. Pretty much the only independent voices today are found on a handful of commercial progressive radio stations, Pacifica, and Free Speech TV.

As a result, America’s media landscape is looking more and more like Orbán’s: unwilling or unable to call our rightwing leadership out for their real agenda of American fascism.

Ninety percent of our media is now owned by six corporations; two rightwing billionaires own our largest social media operations; and Republicans are treated as if a party that’s all-in on sedition is still legitimate.

This past weekend on the Sunday news/politics shows, for example, it was two Republicans for every Democrat as SocialDemocrat61 pointed out on Democratic Underground:

“ABC This Week: Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, GOP Rep. Michael McCaul, GOP Senator Tim Scott (2 republicans and 1 democrat, although cabinet Secretaries are non-partisan we’ll count him as a Dem)

“CBS Face the Nation: Secretary of State Antony Blinken, GOP Senator Mitch McConnell, Liz Cheney (again 2 Republicans and 1 Democrat)

“FOX News Sunday: GOP Senator Mitch McConnell, Dem Rep. Adam Smith, Newt Gingrich (once again 2 republicans and 1 democrat)

“NBC Meet the Press: Secretary of State Antony Blinken, GOP Rep. Kevin McCarthy, Mike Pence. (Yet again 2 republicans and 1 democrat)”

This is nothing new. During the Bush administration the networks told us they needed more Republicans than Democrats on the Sunday shows because Republicans were in power and so we needed to hear from those who could actually make and change legislation.

During the Obama administration the pattern of more Republicans than Democrats continued, but through those 8 years we were told they needed more Republicans because the GOP was the party out of power and so we needed to hear from “the opposition.”

In the middle of the Trump administration, 2018, Media Matters for America again looked at three months worth of Sunday shows and noted that the media had maintained their same ratio:

“Over the past three months, right-leaning guest panels on the five major Sunday political news shows have outnumbered left-leaning panels 33 to six. Nearly half of all guest panels titled right, meaning they had more right-leaning than left-leaning guests; by comparison, less than 10 percent of the panels tilted left.”

This is not how you keep a democracy intact. In the third year of George Washington’s presidency, 1791, our Constitution was amended with the Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment that prevents the government from legislating or dictating the news.

Four years later, according to 19th century historian Thomas Carlyle, British conservative Edmund Burke defined the press as “the fourth estate of the realm.” He meant it as a slur; Burke was no egalitarian and in his opinion the press of his day, enthralled by the American revolutionaries’ example, too often tended in that direction.

In the roughly three centuries since the rise of American democracy and the British royal family’s largely surrendering sovereignty to Parliament and the people who elect them at a local level, a free and independent press has played a vital role in maintaining and preserving the robust and adversarial political system necessary for a functioning republic.

The author of the Declaration of Independence and the first draft of that Bill of Rights (in correspondence with James Madison), Thomas Jefferson wrote:

“The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide, whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”

Make no mistake: the MAGA faction of the GOP, which has largely taken over that party nationwide, is irreversibly committed to gerrymanders that defy the will of voters, supporting oligarch-owned for-profit media that caters to them, and ending the independence of public schools, colleges, and universities.

Consider how gerrymanders fly in the face of democracy itself. In multiple states, more citizens voted for Democrats than Republicans, which is why each of those states now have a Democratic governor (a statewide election).

But Wisconsin, for example, gives us a quick view of how the GOP has gone around democracy to hang onto power against the will of the state’s people. Fully 53% of the state voted Democratic, but their delegation to the US House is made up of 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats. In the State House, Republicans hold 64 out of 99 seats; it’s the same story in the State Senate with Republicans keeping 22 out of 33 seats.

Increasingly, Democratic politicians are starting to emphasize these structural impediments to functional democracy in America. It’s becoming all too clear how they’re being rigged by the GOP in Red state after Red state to hold onto power, even in the face of rising opposition from voters.

Voters who believe in democracy, a free press, and a public education system committed to honest inquiry and intellectual integrity must now step up and let their representatives know how important these things are to them. I’ll continue to point this out here on HartmannReport.com.

Because, as Russia and Hungary show us, once a country has lost the institutions that maintain its democracy, it’s damn hard to get them back. 

Posted in America, democracy, elections, extremism, fascism, media, Republican Party | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

War in the Middle East

Hal and I spend the hour talking about the Israeli-Palestine War and what comes next.

Posted in extremism, foreign policy, Israel, Middle East, military, Terrorism, war | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

TRUMP WILL NOT BE PRESIDENT AGAIN—IT WILL BE HIS CHOICE

By Arlen Grossman/ DailyKos.com/ September 27, 2023

Also: OpEdNews/ October 2, 2023

None of us knows what will happen election night, 2024. But if I were in Las Vegas and could make a bet on the outcome, I would bet Donald Trump would not be on the ballot. 

Many observers look at his lead in the polls and are certain he will be the Republican nominee for president. I am not one of those people.

Auto workers union to announce plans on Friday to expand strike in contract dispute with companies

As 2023 progresses and 2024 right behind it, Donald Trump will spend a lot of time in the courtroom. He will be in front of judges and grand juries multiple times in the coming months. He has 91 felony charges against him and we can expect many more. 

The evidence against him is overwhelming. Trump has lied and cheated in every business or political venture he has ever undertaken. His lawyers are unable to mount a credible defense. He could mount a defense of his own in court, but doesn’t have the ability to do so. If he spoke during his trial, his lawyers would have a fit. They know he would dig himself a deeper hole.

As popular as he is with his base, as the election draws nearer, Republicans would have to wonder about the value of a potential or real criminal representing their party. I suspect the ex-president’s polls will gradually decline, especially if one of his GOP opponents looks electable.

Besides that, he has begun saying more bizarre and crazy things as the pressure mounts on him. He has already begun to repeat more

absurb, unhinged complaints and irrational attacks on his prosecutors. Potential voters will start noticing his rapid mental breakdown. 

But we know Trump does not give up easily or at all. However, as it appears all his legal troubles are mounting and the possibility of going to jail becomes more likely, he has displayed obvious signs of fear.

Under those circumstances, the Justice Department might welcome a way out of their own difficult position. Most likely, Attorney General Merrick Garland recoils at the idea of sending a former President of the United States to prison. As much as Trump deserves that fate, there is no knowing how his millions of his MAGA cult-like followers might react.  The potential for violence from his angriest supporters would have to be considered.

That is when Merrick Garland could play his trump card, so to speak.  He might be willing to present the ex-president an opportunity to avoid prison time. Being behind bars is no doubt terrifying to Trump. But if he accepts a plea deal from the government that would guarantee that he avoids prison time, that would be the best realistic outcome for Trump, his lawyers, his family, and his supporters.

Of course, there will be a cost that will be hard for Trump to stomach.

To avoid spending time in prison, he would have to agree to no longer run for public office, including for president.

The Justice Department would have to get Trump’s prosecutors in other jurisdictions to back that plea deal and not sentence Trump for his many other crimes. For the good of the country–and assuming the legalities would be worked out–it is likely they will agree, knowing the dangerous consequences of Trump potentially becoming president again. They would see that accepting the plea bargain would be the smart and patriotic thing to do and spare the country from certain upheaval if the former president were sent to prison.

I expect Trump would agree to the plea bargain. Spending time in prison  would be frightening  to him and would be further proof of his crimes. It would be the last thing he would want for himself. Trump will see the benefits of agreeing to the plea deal. Remember, this is the guy who claims to have written “The Art of the Deal.”

The country would benefit from precluding the possibility of him becoming the leader of the country. He would still be allowed to spout out the garbage he posts on his social media site and would still have access to the media. 

Naturally I can’t guarantee such a plea deal will come about, but that would be where my money would go in Las Vegas. I think the plea deal should and will happen. It would save the United States the prolonged nightmare of a vicious and divisive election, and the possibility of re-electing this anti-democratic, authoritarian, ego-driven man. Both pro- and anti-Trump camps will be disappointed they won’t get what they want, but it would be best for the future of our divided and insecure nation.

Plea Deal?
Posted in America, democracy, Donald Trump, elections, government, Republican Party | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Cancer and Monopoly

The Hidden History of Monopolies

By Thom Hartmann/ TheHartmannReport.com/ September 24, 2023

This is the Introduction to Hartmann’s newest book Cancer and Monopoly. Available only to subscribers.

Cell phone service that costs $15 a month in France or $12 a  month in Australia bills out at an average of $61.85 per month  in the United States. High-speed broadband that’s a bit over  $31 a month in France or $36 in Germany (for higher speeds  and bett er reliability than almost anywhere in the United  States) averages nearly $70 per month in the US. Similar met rics are found with pharmaceuticals, airfares, and medical  costs, among dozens of other product and service categories.1  Why is this? Monopoly. 

The average American family pays an annual “monopoly  tax”—in additional costs for pretty much everything—of  around $5,000, according to economist Thomas Philippon.  And things are steadily getting worse as monopolistic concentrations continue to tighten their grip on every American  industry from banking to telecom to food.2 

Monopoly isn’t the arcane, legalistic thing that most Americans think of (if they’re not mistaking it for the board game,  which was invented by Elizabeth Magie in 1904 as a cautionary tale3). In multiple very real ways, monopoly touches the  lives of all of us.  

A monopoly is broadly defined as a single part of a larger sys tem that takes over or dominates, controls, and consumes all  the energy and functions of the entire system. In the process, the system is warped and twisted away from its normal func tion and, like a body reacting to a cancer, begins to redirect all  its resources to feed the single monopolistic entity.  

Cancer in the body works pretty much the same way that  monopoly works across an entire spectrum of things, from  monopolies in business to monopolies in religion, language,  agriculture, power systems, and, ultimately, the biological systems of the planet over which we humans have seized monopoly control.  

This book is about what happens when the cancer of  monopoly infects the economic, political, religious, atmospheric, biospheric, or cultural body. In virtually every regard,  the explosion of humanity across our planet, along with our  monopolization of the food, water, soil, and cultural resources  of the planet, is cancer-like. Big business has done the same in  our economic and political realms. Th e result—if we don’t get  this under control soon—will be disaster. 

Which raises a fundamental question, asked from the days  of Plato to Adam Smith to Bernie Sanders: Is the economy  here to serve the majority of the people, or are the majority of  the people here to serve the economy and those few who own  the largest parts of it?  

Until the 1980s, the consensus answer was the former, and  the primary regulator of the economy, the government, largely  worked to protect working people. Since the “Reagan Revolution,” however, the issue has rarely been raised, as media,  the courts, and the majority of politicians of both parties have  chosen the latter answer. 

And the principal vehicle used by those who control most  of the economy to regulate it to their favor and against average  working people has been monopoly. 

Monopoly (using the term in its broadest sense, to include  everything from a single company controlling a market to a  half dozen companies working in a cartel-like fashion) is why  working people’s pay hasn’t gone up since 1982, when President Ronald Reagan’s Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice stopped enforcing the anti-monopoly laws.4 The rich have gotten fabulously richer since then. Consum ers, when harmed or ripped off, have largely been stripped of  their legal powers to hold businesses accountable. America  now lags behind other countries in innovation, which is why  (as one small example) we have the highest pharmaceutical  and health care costs in the world.  

Our streets are filled with guns, our schools have been  stripped of books and school supplies, and our food is so deficient in nutrients (vegetables today have about half the nutrients  they did in 19505) that we are experiencing a malnutrition induced obesity epidemic. 

Monopoly is why it’s so hard to start a new business (particularly a small, local business) and so difficult for existing local  and regional companies to survive. It’s why pension funds  have been “legally” stolen, and the vast majority of workers  have lost or been denied the right to representation in the  workplace.  

Monopoly is why so many of our politicians seem to work  in lockstep against the interests of average people and in favor of big business and the very rich. More and more democra cies around the world are sliding into autocracy and oligarchy.  Our courts have repealed laws passed in the fi rst decade of the  1900s—both federally and in the states—that made it a crime  for corporations to contribute “any thing of value” to political  campaigns, even though voters overwhelmingly support limits on campaign contributions.  

Because of monopolies, billionaires pay lower tax rates than  you do, and the nation’s largest companies not only usually  pay no taxes at all but also get billions every year in subsidies  funded with your tax dollars. So many families have fallen out  of the middle class that this country is experiencing epidem ics of suicide, opioid addiction, and divorce. Our defense budget is bloated, while our returning soldiers find it harder and  harder to get jobs or services. 

Although it’s almost never discussed in our highly monop olized media, monopoly is why right-wing radio and TV are  found in every nook and cranny, every town small and large  across America, while progressive media is marginalized. It’s  why our politics are broken and foreign governments have  been able to manipulate our elections and seize control of so  many of our politicians.  

The simple fact is that everything—literally everything— exists in some sort of a balanced relationship with every thing else and does so because everything obeys simple rules  to maintain that balance. Break the rules—as both business  monopolies and cancer do—and the balance collapses.  

Most of these rules are the rules of nature; our bodies, for  example, have a complex and delicately balanced immune system that detects when a cell has mutated in a way that it’s  breaking the rules, and the immune system takes that cell  apart, recycling its internal materials. But lacking the proper  nutrients to maintain its normal functions, our immune  systems—the rule-keepers—become less and less able to do  their jobs. Th e result is disease and, in the worst cases, cancer.  

Similarly, when the rule-keepers in political and economic  systems are compromised, monopolies emerge just like cancer does in bodies. Those monopolies suck all the resources  out of the system and eventually either change it so much that  it’s no longer functional or push it so far that it collapses.  

During the first few months of a tumor’s growth, if it were  self-aware, it’d be quite proud of its ability to reroute blood  and nutrients away from other cells and into itself. Similarly,  rule-breakers oft en are quite successful, at least for a while.  Consider the organized-crime “mob” and its dominance of  the construction and real estate industries in New York up  until the past few decades.  

For some time, mob- and oligarch-connected real estate  developers like Donald Trump were able to build themselves  empires based on unfairly winning against competitors who  played by the rules and didn’t lie about their properties or  hook up with overseas criminal billionaires looking to stash  ill-gotten gains or hire illegal undocumented laborers from  Poland.  

In the United States, in large part because of massive  changes in the rules of business starting during the Reagan  Revolution, we’re now in the cancer stage of capitalism. Similarly, our environment is badly out of balance and could be 

described as cancerous. So far, most of the victims have been  those who can’t fight back: workers who’ve seen their pay and  rights crash, and people whose homes and lives have been rav aged by out-of-control weather systems they can’t control or  defend against.  

But, like an immune system desperately trying to fight back  against a fast-growing tumor, workers are wising up and starting to demand that the rules return to the kind of balance that  kept wages high and inequality low before Reagan; similarly,  nations around the world are reacting to the climate crisis by  cutting their carbon outputs and moving rapidly to renewable  energy sources. Th e question now is whether the cancer of  monopoly has gone so far that it’s like an end-stage metastasis;  will Western democracy survive its assault? 

Monopoly doesn’t threaten just the business world. It  spreads its cancerous tentacles into politics as well, destroying  the ability of government to make policy that allows free people to make their own decisions about their own lives. 

As President Teddy Roosevelt, the great trust buster, said,  “Th ere can be no eff ective control of corporations while their  political activity remains. To put an end to it will be neither a  short nor an easy task.”6 

Adam Smith wrote, in Wealth of Nations, “[T]he monopoly  which our manufacturers have obtained against us. . . . [L]ike  an overgrown standing army, they have become formidable  to the government, and upon many occasions intimidate the  legislature.”7 

If the economic engine of the United States is to be turned  back to benefi ting the majority of the people rather than today’s small minority, breaking up monopolies will be one of  the most powerful tools to bring about that change.

Next week: Chapter 1 — Monopoly Kills:  Competition, Creativity, and Americans

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment