-
Recent Posts
- Trump Continues To Ruin GOP Chances And Help Dems
- The biggest problem facing the U.S. economy
- Are We On the Verge of a Progressive Revolution Like the New Deal?
- Why are progressives winning across the United States? It’s not complicated
- Republicans Rigged America’s Debt: Now We’re Paying the Billionaires Forever
-
Join 441 other subscribers
Categories
Archives
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
Blogroll
Meta
Single-Payer Health Care–Now Is The Time
By Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report
Right now is an opportune time to push for single-payer nationalized health care in the United States. A number of American companies and franchisees, Papa John’s, Denny’s, and Applebee’s among them, have been quite open about their displeasure with the cost of Obama’s Affordable Care Act and their intentions to cut hours or fire employees when it fully goes into effect.
Sure, many of the complaining CEOs of these companies are greedy, right-wing Republicans, so we shouldn’t be surprised, but perhaps we can afford them the benefit of the doubt on this issue. After all, why should U.S. companies pay for the health insurance of their employees? It’s become expected that large and medium-size businesses provide health insurance to employees, and under the new law, they will be penalized if they don’t.
But is the old system or the new Affordable Care Act the best we can do? Right now, the majority of Americans under age 65 receive their coverage through their employer. But employee health insurance is a huge expense, puts companies at a competitive disadvantage with overseas businesses, and isn’t their obligation, according to the Constitution or any other official document.
To make matters worse, costs for employer-paid health insurance are rising rapidly. Annual premiums for family coverage have increased nearly 100 percent in the last decade. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, average premiums have risen to $5,615 for single coverage and $15,745 for family coverage.
Employer-sponsored health insurance sprang up in this country primarily during and after World War II when companies figured they could attract employees by offering generous benefits. But now that potential employees are plentiful and health care costs have skyrocketed, the whole idea of employer-provided health insurance doesn’t make sense for anybody.
John Jonik
Of course, employer-sponsored health care is unheard of in the rest of the developed world. There is no need for it where government provides health care and/or health insurance, which is the case in every other industrialized nation. Single-payer government health care is in effect here too. It’s called Medicare, but, with a few exceptions, only Americans over age 65 can use it.
What we have for the rest of us is a failed health care system. In 2010, Kaiser reports, the U.S. spent more than $2.6 trillion on health care, more than ten times the amount in 1980. We spend far more on health care than any other country and with much worse results in the most important health categories, e.g. life expectancy and infant mortality. And prior to the Affordable Care Act going into full effect, more than 48 million Americans are lacking health insurance, and according to a 2009 Harvard Medical School study, 45,000 a year die because they don’t have it.
If many corporations don’t like ObamaCare, they have a great opportunity now to join forces with liberals and fight for single-payer, nationalized health insurance. They would make strange bedfellows indeed, but for the employers, single-payer would free them from the costly obligation to provide health insurance. It would push private insurance companies–who, because of their quest for ever-increasing profits have driven up the cost of health care–out of the equation. The time to make this happen is now, before the major portions of the Affordable Care Act go into effect, before millions more Americans are forced to go into battle with private health insurance companies.
So, Papa John’s and other companies, stop griping about ObamaCare. This is the time to join forces with liberal/progressive groups (and the majority of Americans, according to many polls) in pushing for single-payer, government-run health insurance. It’s unlikely, but if you did, we could all benefit.
ALSO PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM November 28, 2012
Posted in government, health care
Tagged Affordable Care Act, John Jonik, Matt Wuerker, nationalized health insurance, Obamacare, single-payer
5 Comments
Killing the Messenger
Prosecution of Anonymous activists highlights war for Internet control
The US and allied governments exploit both law and cyber-attacks as a weapon to punish groups that challenge it
By Glenn Greenwald/ The Guardian/ November 23, 2012

From a video posted by the Anonymous hacking collective urging the US public to stop the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection act (Cispa) in the Senate Photograph: YouTube/TheAnonMessage
Whatever one thinks of WikiLeaks, it is an indisputable fact that the group has never been charged by any government with any crime, let alone convicted of one. Despite that crucial fact, WikiLeaks has been crippled by a staggering array of extra-judicial punishment imposed either directly by the US and allied governments or with their clear acquiescence.
In December 2010, after WikiLeaks began publishing US diplomatic cables, it was hit with cyber-attacks so massive that the group was “forced to change its web address after the company providing its domain name cut off service”. After public demands and private pressure from US Senate Homeland Security Chairman Joe Lieberman, Amazon then cut off all hosting services to WikiLeaks. Sophisticated cyber-attacks shortly thereafter forced the group entirely off all US website services when its California-based internet hosting provider, Everydns, terminated service, “saying it did so to prevent its other 500,000 customers of being affected by the intense cyber-attacks targeted at WikiLeaks”.
Meanwhile, Chairman Lieberman’s public pressure, by design, also led to the destruction of WikiLeaks’ ability to collect funds from supporters. Master Card and Visa both announced they would refuse to process payments to the group, as did America’s largest financial institution, Bank of America. Paypal not only did the same but froze all funds already in WikiLeaks’ accounts (almost two years later, a court in Iceland ruled that a Visa payment processor violated contract law by cutting of those services). On several occasions in both 2011 and 2012, WikiLeaks was prevented from remaining online by cyber-attacks.
Over the past two years, then, this group – convicted of no crime but engaged in pathbreaking journalism that produced more scoops than all other media outlets combined and received numerous journalism awards – has been effectively prevented from functioning, receiving funds, or even maintaining a presence on US internet servers. While it’s unproven what direct role the US government played in these actions, it is unquestionably clear that a top US Senator successfully pressured private corporations to cut off its finances, and more important, neither the US nor its allies have taken any steps to discover and apprehend the perpetrators of the cyber-attacks that repeatedly targeted WikiLeaks, nor did it even investigate those attacks.
The ominous implications of all this have never been fully appreciated. Recall that all the way back in 2008, the Pentagon prepared a secret report (ultimately leaked to WikiLeaks) that decreed WikiLeaks to be a “threat to the US Army” and an enemy of the US. That report plotted tactics that “would damage and potentially destroy” its ability to function. That is exactly what came to pass.
So this was a case where the US government – through affirmative steps and/or approving acquiescence to criminal, sophisticated cyber-attacks – all but destroyed the ability of an adversarial group, convicted of no crime, to function on the internet. Who would possibly consider that power anything other than extremely disturbing? What possible political value can the internet serve, or journalism generally, if the US government, outside the confines of law, is empowered – as it did here – to cripple the operating abilities of any group which meaningfully challenges its policies and exposes its wrongdoing?
But what makes all of this even more significant is the vastly disparate treatment of those who launched far less sophisticated and damaging attacks at those corporations which complied with US demands and cut off all funding and other services to WikiLeaks. Acting in the name of Anonymous, a handful of activists targeted those companies with simple “denial of service” attacks, ones that impeded the operations of those corporate websites for a few hours.
In stark contrast to the far more significant attacks aimed at WikiLeaks, these attacks, designed to protest the treatment of WikiLeaks, spawned a global manhunt by western nations and, ultimately, the arrest of dozens of mostly young alleged hackers, four of whom are now on trial in London:
(Continued/ Read Entire Article Here)
Boldface added by BPR Editor
Posted in civil liberties, law, media
Tagged Anonymous, cyber-attacks, Glenn Greenwald, Joe Lieberman, the Guardian, WikiLeaks
Leave a comment
Disobedience As Virtue
BPR Quote of the Day:
from
Like Quotes? Check Out the BPR Editor’s QUOTATIONQUOTIENT.COM
Posted in philosophy, Quotations
Tagged disobedience, Oscar Wilde, rebellion, The Soul of Man Under Socialism
2 Comments
In the Spirit of the Holiday Season
Posted in humor, political cartoon, political humor
Tagged brainlesstales.com, Can't we all just get along?, paper, rock, scissors
Leave a comment









Source: Jared Bernstein, Center for Budget and Policy Priorities