Evil Empire

Posted in foreign policy, Iran, military, Terrorism, war | Tagged | 6 Comments

Single-Payer Health Care–Now Is The Time

By Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

Right now is an opportune time to push for single-payer nationalized health care in the United States. A number of American companies and franchisees, Papa John’s, Denny’s, and Applebee’s among them, have been quite open about their displeasure with the cost of Obama’s Affordable Care Act and their intentions to cut hours or fire employees when it fully goes into effect.

Sure, many of the complaining CEOs of these companies are greedy, right-wing Republicans, so we shouldn’t be surprised, but perhaps we can afford them the benefit of the doubt on this issue. After all, why should U.S. companies pay for the health insurance of their employees? It’s become expected that large and medium-size businesses provide health insurance to employees, and under the new law, they will be penalized if they don’t.

But is the old system or the new Affordable Care Act the best we can do? Right now, the majority of Americans under age 65 receive their coverage through their employer. But employee health insurance is a huge expense, puts companies at a competitive disadvantage with overseas businesses, and isn’t their obligation, according to the Constitution or any other official document.

To make matters worse, costs for employer-paid health insurance are rising rapidly. Annual premiums for family coverage have increased nearly 100 percent in the last decade. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, average premiums have risen to $5,615 for single coverage and $15,745 for family coverage.

Employer-sponsored health insurance sprang up in this country primarily during and after World War II when companies figured they could attract employees by offering generous benefits. But now that potential employees are plentiful and health care costs have skyrocketed, the whole idea of employer-provided health insurance doesn’t make sense for anybody.

John Jonik

Of course, employer-sponsored health care is unheard of in the rest of the developed world. There is no need for it where government provides health care and/or health insurance, which is the case in every other industrialized nation. Single-payer government health care is in effect here too. It’s called Medicare, but, with a few exceptions, only Americans over age 65 can use it.

What we have for the rest of us is a failed health care system. In 2010, Kaiser reports, the U.S. spent more than $2.6 trillion on health care, more than ten times the amount in 1980.  We spend far more on health care than any other country and with much worse results in the most important health categories, e.g. life expectancy and infant mortality. And prior to the Affordable Care Act going into full effect, more than 48 million Americans are lacking health insurance, and according to a 2009 Harvard Medical School study, 45,000 a year die because they don’t have it.

If many corporations don’t like ObamaCare, they have a great opportunity now to join forces with  liberals and fight for single-payer, nationalized health insurance. They would make strange bedfellows indeed, but for the employers, single-payer would free them from the costly obligation to provide health insurance. It would push private insurance companies–who, because of their quest for ever-increasing profits have driven up the cost of health care–out of the equation. The time to make this happen is now, before the major portions of the Affordable Care Act go into effect, before millions more Americans are forced to go into battle with private health insurance companies.

So, Papa John’s and other companies, stop griping about ObamaCare. This is the time to join forces with liberal/progressive groups (and the majority of Americans, according to many polls) in pushing for single-payer, government-run health insurance. It’s unlikely, but if you did, we could all benefit.

ALSO PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM  November 28, 2012

 

Posted in government, health care | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

They Should Have Listened to You, Barry

Posted in philosophy, politics, Quotations, religion, Republican Party | Tagged | 2 Comments

Are You Happy Yet?

BPR Quote of the Day:

Posted in philosophy, poster, Quotations | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Killing the Messenger

Prosecution of Anonymous activists highlights war for Internet control

The US and allied governments exploit both law and cyber-attacks as a weapon to punish groups that challenge it

By Glenn Greenwald/ The Guardian/ November 23, 2012

Anonymous message to Americans over Cispa

From a video posted by the Anonymous hacking collective urging the US public to stop the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection act (Cispa) in the Senate Photograph: YouTube/TheAnonMessage

Whatever one thinks of WikiLeaks, it is an indisputable fact that the group has never been charged by any government with any crime, let alone convicted of one. Despite that crucial fact, WikiLeaks has been crippled by a staggering array of extra-judicial punishment imposed either directly by the US and allied governments or with their clear acquiescence.

In December 2010, after WikiLeaks began publishing US diplomatic cables, it was hit with cyber-attacks so massive that the group was “forced to change its web address after the company providing its domain name cut off service”. After public demands and private pressure from US Senate Homeland Security Chairman Joe Lieberman, Amazon then cut off all hosting services to WikiLeaks. Sophisticated cyber-attacks shortly thereafter forced the group entirely off all US website services when its California-based internet hosting provider, Everydns, terminated service, “saying it did so to prevent its other 500,000 customers of being affected by the intense cyber-attacks targeted at WikiLeaks”.

Meanwhile, Chairman Lieberman’s public pressure, by design, also led to the destruction of WikiLeaks’ ability to collect funds from supporters. Master Card and Visa both announced they would refuse to process payments to the group, as did America’s largest financial institution, Bank of America. Paypal not only did the same but froze all funds already in WikiLeaks’ accounts (almost two years later, a court in Iceland ruled that a Visa payment processor violated contract law by cutting of those services). On several occasions in both 2011 and 2012, WikiLeaks was prevented from remaining online by cyber-attacks.

Over the past two years, then, this group – convicted of no crime but engaged in pathbreaking journalism that produced more scoops than all other media outlets combined and received numerous journalism awards – has been effectively prevented from functioning, receiving funds, or even maintaining a presence on US internet servers. While it’s unproven what direct role the US government played in these actions, it is unquestionably clear that a top US Senator successfully pressured private corporations to cut off its finances, and more important, neither the US nor its allies have taken any steps to discover and apprehend the perpetrators of the cyber-attacks that repeatedly targeted WikiLeaks, nor did it even investigate those attacks.

The ominous implications of all this have never been fully appreciated. Recall that all the way back in 2008, the Pentagon prepared a secret report (ultimately leaked to WikiLeaks) that decreed WikiLeaks to be a “threat to the US Army” and an enemy of the US. That report plotted tactics that “would damage and potentially destroy” its ability to function. That is exactly what came to pass.

So this was a case where the US government – through affirmative steps and/or approving acquiescence to criminal, sophisticated cyber-attacks – all but destroyed the ability of an adversarial group, convicted of no crime, to function on the internet. Who would possibly consider that power anything other than extremely disturbing? What possible political value can the internet serve, or journalism generally, if the US government, outside the confines of law, is empowered – as it did here – to cripple the operating abilities of any group which meaningfully challenges its policies and exposes its wrongdoing?

But what makes all of this even more significant is the vastly disparate treatment of those who launched far less sophisticated and damaging attacks at those corporations which complied with US demands and cut off all funding and other services to WikiLeaks. Acting in the name of Anonymous, a handful of activists targeted those companies with simple “denial of service” attacks, ones that impeded the operations of those corporate websites for a few hours.

In stark contrast to the far more significant attacks aimed at WikiLeaks, these attacks, designed to protest the treatment of WikiLeaks, spawned a global manhunt by western nations and, ultimately, the arrest of dozens of mostly young alleged hackers, four of whom are now on trial in London:

(Continued/ Read Entire Article Here)

Boldface added by BPR Editor
Posted in civil liberties, law, media | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Disobedience As Virtue

BPR Quote of the Day:

from

Like Quotes? Check Out the BPR Editor’s QUOTATIONQUOTIENT.COM
Posted in philosophy, Quotations | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Black Friday

Posted in economy, humor, political humor | Tagged | Leave a comment

Thanksgiving Traditions

BPR Quote of the Day– Jon Stewart

Posted in humor, political humor, Quotations | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

In the Spirit of the Holiday Season

brainlesstales.com
Posted in humor, political cartoon, political humor | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Divided Economy

                                       

            Why Economic Demand Is Weak and Americans Worry:

                             Corporate Profits Rise As Wages Fall

Source: Jared Bernstein, Center for Budget and Policy Priorities
Posted in Economics, economy, inequality | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment