Single-Payer Health Care–Now Is The Time

By Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

Right now is an opportune time to push for single-payer nationalized health care in the United States. A number of American companies and franchisees, Papa John’s, Denny’s, and Applebee’s among them, have been quite open about their displeasure with the cost of Obama’s Affordable Care Act and their intentions to cut hours or fire employees when it fully goes into effect.

Sure, many of the complaining CEOs of these companies are greedy, right-wing Republicans, so we shouldn’t be surprised, but perhaps we can afford them the benefit of the doubt on this issue. After all, why should U.S. companies pay for the health insurance of their employees? It’s become expected that large and medium-size businesses provide health insurance to employees, and under the new law, they will be penalized if they don’t.

But is the old system or the new Affordable Care Act the best we can do? Right now, the majority of Americans under age 65 receive their coverage through their employer. But employee health insurance is a huge expense, puts companies at a competitive disadvantage with overseas businesses, and isn’t their obligation, according to the Constitution or any other official document.

To make matters worse, costs for employer-paid health insurance are rising rapidly. Annual premiums for family coverage have increased nearly 100 percent in the last decade. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, average premiums have risen to $5,615 for single coverage and $15,745 for family coverage.

Employer-sponsored health insurance sprang up in this country primarily during and after World War II when companies figured they could attract employees by offering generous benefits. But now that potential employees are plentiful and health care costs have skyrocketed, the whole idea of employer-provided health insurance doesn’t make sense for anybody.

John Jonik

Of course, employer-sponsored health care is unheard of in the rest of the developed world. There is no need for it where government provides health care and/or health insurance, which is the case in every other industrialized nation. Single-payer government health care is in effect here too. It’s called Medicare, but, with a few exceptions, only Americans over age 65 can use it.

What we have for the rest of us is a failed health care system. In 2010, Kaiser reports, the U.S. spent more than $2.6 trillion on health care, more than ten times the amount in 1980.  We spend far more on health care than any other country and with much worse results in the most important health categories, e.g. life expectancy and infant mortality. And prior to the Affordable Care Act going into full effect, more than 48 million Americans are lacking health insurance, and according to a 2009 Harvard Medical School study, 45,000 a year die because they don’t have it.

If many corporations don’t like ObamaCare, they have a great opportunity now to join forces with  liberals and fight for single-payer, nationalized health insurance. They would make strange bedfellows indeed, but for the employers, single-payer would free them from the costly obligation to provide health insurance. It would push private insurance companies–who, because of their quest for ever-increasing profits have driven up the cost of health care–out of the equation. The time to make this happen is now, before the major portions of the Affordable Care Act go into effect, before millions more Americans are forced to go into battle with private health insurance companies.

So, Papa John’s and other companies, stop griping about ObamaCare. This is the time to join forces with liberal/progressive groups (and the majority of Americans, according to many polls) in pushing for single-payer, government-run health insurance. It’s unlikely, but if you did, we could all benefit.



This entry was posted in government, health care and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Single-Payer Health Care–Now Is The Time

  1. ragnarsbhut says:

    Arlen Grossman, if government (through our tax dollars) only paid the bills, paid for the consultation, however, we had the right to choose what medical care providers we saw, I would have no problem with that. Just my thoughts.

  2. Arlen Grossman, if government only paid for the consultation between a doctor and a patient, however, the patient was free to decide the doctor of their choosing, I would not object to that. My only issue is with people who automatically assume that because a right does not originate from the government it is being made equivalent to claiming that it is not a right at all. A right to life does not originate from the government. The right to free speech does not originate from the government.

  3. List of X says:

    I can only imagine how many billions of dollars the health insurance companies would drop into lobbying against the single payer system.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s