“Swing-State” Voters

Source Unknown
Posted in Barack Obama, elections, media, Mitt Romney, political humor, politics | 2 Comments

By All Rights, Democrats Should Win in a Landslide

By Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

By all rights, President Obama and the Democrats should win the 2012 election by a landslide. By all rights, President Obama should have no trouble defeating a wealthy private equity manager with shifting values and minimal personality. By all rights, Democrats should be building a strong majority in the Senate and should recapture the House. But that isn’t going to be the case.

The Alex character, in Sunday’s Doonesbury, summed it up quite aptly, “It just amazes me that only a few years after the economy was brought to its knees by a gang of predatory Wall Street plutocrats–that the GOP would nominate a predatory Wall Street plutocrat!”

Conservative ideology, i.e. tax cuts and deregulation, caused the 2008 financial meltdown, but the Republicans are sticking with it. The Tea Party has slipped in popularity, only 32 percent view the group favorably, 46 percent negatively. Only 25 percent of Americans identify as Republicans, compared to 32 percent who call themselves Democrats. President Obama is an incumbent president presiding over a difficult economy, but one that is gradually improving.

Despite all that, the Democratic Party will not win their landslide. The election is expected to be close, and Democrats will be lucky to be any better off after this election than before.

The reason for this anomaly boils down to two significant problems for Democrats. Most important is the huge advantage in money enjoyed by Republicans and their wealthy benefactors. When the Supreme Court gave the green light to unlimited campaign donations, Republicans could be confident they would always be competitive. Super PACS are able to funnel millions of dollars of campaign contributions, often from undisclosed billionaire donors, into political races large and small, all over the country. It’s a great investment, too, considering the big bang for their bucks they receive in subsidies, tax breaks, and favorable legislation.

The second problem for Democrats is the massive right-wing propaganda machine spewing out conservative messages to receptive audiences.  The days of political consensus are a thing of the past. Were President Obama to rescue a helpless little girl from a burning building, a large chunk of the population would hear and believe that the President was encouraging the kid to be dependent and denying the child a chance to learn how to save herself. Right-wing media have absolutely nothing good to say about President Obama or any Democrats but never run short of negative talking points. Left-wing media does the same for its side, but has nowhere near the national coverage or influence of their competitors.

Because Republican candidates, no matter how unqualified or extreme, can count on substantial campaign contributions, as well as favorable coverage from sympathetic media, many GOP candidates that by all rights shouldn’t be in competitive races, are in relatively good shape heading into Election Day.

osundefender.org

If Democrats survive the election with an Obama victory and a relative status quo in Congress they should consider themselves fortunate. There is not a lot they can do about the right-wing media edge (except finding rich liberals to buy more outlets), but if they don’t figure out how to lessen the impact of unlimited campaign contributions, they will always be struggling to stay competitive in future elections. A constitutional amendment or a new Supreme Court must bring down the “money is free speech” and “corporations are people” doctrines and return politics and elections to the American people.

Democracy is being gutted by obscene campaign spending and unprecedented disinformation. By all rights, the American people deserve to have their democracy returned intact.

ALSO PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM (Headline Status) November 5, 2012
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, elections, government, Mitt Romney, politics, Republican Party, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Obstacles

click to enlarge
McFadden/ New York Times
Posted in cartoon, elections, law, political humor, politics | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

DOES THE CONSTITUTION STILL MATTER?

Al-Aulaqi v. Panetta: Lawsuit Challenging Targeted Killings

ACLU/ October 24, 2012

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights(CCR) have filed a lawsuit challenging the government’s targeted killing of three U.S. citizens in drone strikes far from any armed conflict zone.

In Al-Aulaqi v. Panetta (Al-Awlaki v. Panetta) the groups charge that the U.S. government’s killings of U.S. citizens Anwar Al-Aulaqi, Samir Khan, and 16-year-old Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi in Yemen last year violated the Constitution’s fundamental guarantee against the deprivation of life without due process of law.

The killings were part of a broader program of “targeted killing” by the United States outside the context of armed conflict and based on vague legal standards, a closed executive process, and evidence never presented to the courts.

Since 2002, and routinely since 2009, the U.S. government has carried out deliberate and premeditated killings of suspected terrorists overseas.  In some cases, including that of Anwar Al-Aulaqi, the targets were placed on “kill lists” maintained by the CIA and the Pentagon.  According to news accounts, the targeted killing program has expanded to include “signature strikes” in which the government does not know the identity of individuals, but targets them based on “patterns” of behavior that have never been made public.  The New York Times recently reported that the government counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent.

Outside of armed conflict, both the Constitution and international law prohibit killing without due process, except as a last resort to avert a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury.  Even in the context of an armed conflict against an armed group (which did not exist in Yemen at the time of these killings), the government may use lethal force only against individuals who are directly participating in hostilities against the United States.  Regardless of the context, whenever the government uses lethal force, it must take all possible steps to avoid harming civilian bystanders. The lawsuit argues that the senior CIA and military leaders who authorized and directed the killings violated these standards.

Anwar Al-Aulaqi and Samir Khan were killed in a U.S. drone strike in Yemen on September 30, 2011.  Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi, a 16-year-old boy born in Denver, was killed in a U.S. drone strike in Yemen on October 14, 2011, while he was eating dinner at an outdoor restaurant with his teenage cousin.

Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi

According to the legal complaint, the killings violated the right to due process under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, the prohibition on unreasonable seizures under the Fourth Amendment, and, with respect to Anwar Al-Aulaqi, the ban on extrajudicial death warrants imposed by the Constitution’s Bill of Attainder Clause.  The killings also violated international law, which is incorporated through the Constitution.

This case follows a lawsuit filed by the ACLU and CCR in 2010 challenging Anwar Al-Aulaqi’s placement on government kill lists, before his death. A federal district court dismissed the case, holding that the plaintiff, Al-Aulaqi’s father, lacked standing to bring suit, and that the request for before-the-fact judicial review raised “political questions” that the court could not decide.

Read the complaint >>

 

Posted in civil liberties, crime, foreign policy, Justice, law, law enforcement, military, Terrorism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Good Advice From Mom

Posted in elections, humor, political humor, politics | Tagged | 2 Comments

List of X's avatarList of X

Early this week, hurricane Sandy brought havoc and devastation to several Northeastern states.  As President, Barack Obama quickly sprang into action along with FEMA coordinating the relief effort.  And although as a candidate Mitt Romney does not have the same resources as his opponent, it does not mean he is staying on the sidelines.  Here are 10 ways how Mitt Romney has helped those affected by the hurricane.

1)  Called for emergency 50% tax cut for the rich.

2)  Mailed out letters to all registered Democrats in Virginia, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire informing them that if they are too busy with hurricane cleanup work, they could go to the polls on November 8 instead of November 6.

3)  Donated 12,000 campaign ads to Red Cross.

4)  Found several lost pets, tied them to the roof of his campaign bus and personally transported them to the nearest shelter.

5)  For sports…

View original post 208 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

RFK Jr: Democracy Under Assault

BPR Quote of the Day:

“American democracy is under assault…..

The senators and congressmen (the Super PACS) fund and elect are not representing the United States—they are representing Koch and its oil industry cronies, Big Pharma, and the Wall Street banksters currently mounting a hostile takeover of our government.

I have no problem characterizing these corporate-centric super-PACs as treasonous.  We are now in a free fall toward old-fashioned oligarchy; noxious, thieving and tyrannical.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

 (from the foreword to Billionaires & Ballot Bandits by Greg Palast) 

LIKE QUOTES? CHECK OUT QUOTATIONQUOTIENT.COM

 

Posted in elections, politics, Uncategorized, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

To “Save” You?

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Global Warming: Not Exactly a New Concept

Posted in environment, media | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

OMG!!!!

Posted in elections, Mitt Romney, political humor, politics | Tagged , | 1 Comment