Pants on Fire

 Did Paul Ryan “borrow” story about his daughter from Kurt Cobain?

By John Aravosis/ Americablog/ October 12, 2012

Reddit community member robcross1977 noted something odd about Paul Ryan’s story last night about how he became pro-life.

Here’s Paul Ryan during last night’s debate on how he became pro-life, and how his daughter got the nickname “Bean”:

You know, I think about 10 1/2 years ago, my wife Janna and I went to Mercy Hospital in Janesville where I was born, for our seven week ultrasound for our firstborn child, and we saw that heartbeat. A little baby was in the shape of a bean. And to this day, we have nicknamed our firstborn child Liza, “Bean.” Now I believe that life begins at conception.

And here’s Kurt Cobain’s and Courtney Love’s daughter Frances Bean Cobain on how she got the name “Bean” twenty years ago:

Frances Bean Cobain was born at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and was immediately anointed the world’s newest rock princess. Her parents were two of the biggest rock stars on the planet and her godfather is R.E.M frontman Michael Stipe. Kurt Cobain named his daughter after Frances McKee, the guitarist for The Vaselines, and gave her the middle named Bean because he thought she resembled a kidney bean on the ultrasound. Unfortunately, Frances never really got to know her father; he shot himself to death when she was just 20 months old.

Ryan is reportedly a Nirvana fan, the band that Kurt Cobain started and starred in. We’re to believe this is just a coincidence? Maybe.  Or maybe Paul Ryan plagiarized the story about his daughter?

What’s more likely is that Ryan named his daughter Bean because Cobain named his daughter Bean. But that wouldn’t have made a very good right-wingy story, for Ryan to explain that he named his kid after a grunge rock star who killed himself. Or even to say that the name was inspired by Cobain. So, better to borrow Cobain’s story and not even mention it.

Keep in mind that while it’s entirely possible that Paul Ryan had his “Bean” experience without knowing of Cobain’s, Ryan has a history of making up personal stories to embellish his image.  There was the time he claimed he climbed 40 of the Rocky Mountains.  Or the time he claimed to have run a marathon under three hours.  From an interview Paul Ryan did with conservative blogger Hugh Hewitt:

Yeah, fast is one way of putting it.

And who can forget Ryan’s claim to have 6% body fat.  Or Ryan’s claim to have six studies proving that Mitt Romney’s tax cuts for the wealthy won’t break the bank (most of the “studies” were in fact blog posts).

When you consider the source, it’s a valid question to ask whether anything Paul Ryan says is credible.

So, even Paul Ryan’s most intimate part of the debate, talking about his Catholicism and abortion beliefs, might be phony.

PS Not to mention, so was Paul Ryan pro-choice before he “saw” his daughter as a bean?

Posted in Abortion, elections, Paul Ryan, politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

OBAMNEY–HEADS THEY WIN, TAILS WE LOSE

The BPR Editor wants to see President Obama re-elected, as a President Romney would be a considerably worse scenario. Still, Roberts makes an excellent point–no matter which major party candidate wins, the real winners (as always) will be the 1%…

Evil is Evil — Don’t Vote for Evil

By Paul Craig Roberts/ OpEdNews/ October 12, 2012

Back during the George W. Bush neocon regime, President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela in his UN speech summed up George W. Bush for the world. I am quoting Chavez from memory, not verbatim. “Yesterday standing at this same podium was Satan himself, speaking as if he owned the world. You can still smell the sulfur.”

Chavez is one of the American right-wing’s favorite bogymen, because Chavez helps the people instead of bleeding them for the rich, which is Washington’s way. While Washington has driven all but the one percent into the ground, Chavez cut poverty in half, doubled university enrollment, and provided health care and old age pensions to millions of Venezuelans for the first time.

Little wonder he was elected to a third term as president despite the many millions of dollars Washington poured into the election campaign of Chavez’s opponent.

While Washington and the EU preach neoliberalism — the supremacy of capital over labor — South American politicians who reject Washington’s way are being elected and reelected in Venezuela, Ecuador, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Bolivia.

It was the Ecuadoran government, not Washington, that had the moral integrity to grant political asylum to WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange. The only time Washington grants asylum is when it can be used to embarrass an opponent.

In contrast to the leadership that is emerging in South America as more governments there reject the traditional hegemony of Washington, the US political elite, whether Republican or Democrat, are aligned with the rich against the American people.

The Republican candidate, Mitt Romney, has promised to cut taxes on the rich, taxes which are already rock bottom, to block any regulation of the gangsters in the financial arena, and to privatize Social Security and Medicare.

Privatizing Social Security and Medicare means to divert the people’s tax dollars to the profits of private corporations. In Republican hands, privatization means only one thing: to cut the people’s benefits and to use the people’s tax dollars to increase the profits in the private sector. Romney’s policy is just another policy that sacrifices the people to the one percent.

Unfortunately, the Democrats, if a lesser evil, are still an evil. There is no reason to vote for the reelection of a president who codified into law the Bush regime’s destruction of the US Constitution, who went one step further and asserted the power to murder US citizens without due process of law, and who has done nothing to stop the exploitation of the American people by the one percent.

As Gerald Celente says in the Autumn Issue of the Trends Journal, when confronted with the choice between two evils, you don’t vote for the lessor evil. You boycott the election and do not vote. “Lessor or greater, evil is evil.”

If Americans had any sense, no one would vote in the November election.  Whoever wins the November election, it will be a defeat for the American people.

An Obama or Romney win stands in stark contrast with Chavez’s win. Here is how Lula da Silva, the popular former president of Brazil summed it up: “Chavez’s victory is a victory for all the peoples of Latin America. It is another blow against imperialism.” Washington, making full use of the almighty dollar, was unable to buy the Venezuelan election.How will a Romney or Obama win be summed up? The answer will be in terms of which candidate is best for Israel’s interest; which is best for Wall Street’s interest, which is best for agribusiness; which is most likely to attack Iran; which is most likely to subject economic and war protesters to indefinite detention as domestic extremists; which is most likely to screw the American people in order to benefit the ruling oligarchy. The only people who will benefit from the election of either Romney or Obama are those associated with the private oligarchies that rule America.

Boldface added by BPR Editor

 Paul Craig Roberts is a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal.

Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, elections, government, Mitt Romney, politics, Republican Party | Tagged , | Leave a comment

You Messed With the Wrong Bird, Mitt

Posted in Mitt Romney, poster | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Up Side of Slavery

BPR Quote of the Day:

“… the institution of slavery that the black race has long believed to be an abomination upon its people may actually have been a blessing in disguise. The blacks who could endure those conditions and circumstances would someday be rewarded with citizenship in the greatest nation ever established upon the face of the Earth.” 

Arkansas State Rep. Jon Hubbard (R-Jonesboro)

This quote is from Hubbard’s 2010 book  Letters to the Editor: Confessions of a Frustrated Conservative.

Among other gems:

African Americans must “understand that even while in the throes of slavery, their lives as Americans are likely much better than they ever would have enjoyed living in sub-Saharan Africa.”

“Knowing what we know today about life on the African continent, would an existence spent in slavery have been any crueler than a life spent in sub-Saharan Africa?” 

“..the immigration issue, both legal and illegal… will lead to planned wars or extermination. Although now this seems to be barbaric and uncivilized, it will at some point become as necessary as eating and breathing.” 

More:

Republican extremists, in their own words

10 Conservatives Who Have Praised American Slavery

 

Posted in Quotations, Republican Party | Tagged | 1 Comment

Presidential Debate–The Musical

Posted in Barack Obama, elections, humor, Mitt Romney, politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Multiple Personality Disorder

Posted in humor, Mitt Romney, poster | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Mindless Babble Season

Joshuakemble.com

BPR Quote of the Day:

“Political language — and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists — is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” 

George Orwell

 
Posted in elections, politics, Quotations | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sucking Off the Government Teat

Posted in economy, government, military, politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why We Still Need FDR

BPR Quote of the Day:

Roosevelt followed that quote with these stirring words:

“Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me–and I welcome their hatred.”

from Franklin D. Roosevelt address announcing the Second New Deal, Oct. 31, 1936

Posted in Economics, economy, finance, government, politics, Quotations | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The War Machine Drones On

By Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

Hillary Clinton holds a small U.S.-made drone that the Ugandan military uses in Somalia to fight al-Qaeda linked militants.(Credit: Reuters)

A comprehensive report, Living Under Drones, released in last September by the Stanford International Human Rights & Conflict Resolution Center and the Global Justice Clinic at New York University School of Law challenges the prevailing American view that the use of unmanned drone strikes is a precise and effective tool in combating terrorism.

Among the major points from their study, based on nine months of research and extensive interviews in Pakistan with civilian victims, doctors, humanitarian workers, journalists, etc:

1) “While civilian casualties are rarely acknowledged by the US government, there is significant evidence that US drone strikes have injured and killed civilians.” The U.S. government typically denies or understates civilian casualties from drone strikes, and official data is hard to come by. This report, using figures from The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (a London-based, independent investigative organization) indicates 2562 to 3325 people killed by drones in Pakistan since 2004, of whom 474 to 881 are civilians, 176 of them children.

2) “US drone strike policies cause considerable and under-accounted-for harm to the daily lives of ordinary civilians, beyond death and physical injury.” The report describes the psychological trauma of civilians knowing that strikes can occur at any time and knowing they are powerless to protect themselves. Family members have reported being afraid to attend funerals of victims because such gatherings have been targeted by drone attacks. The report also talks about the “double trap,” in which a drone strike is followed up by another strike that kills rescuers and medical personnel, leaving first responders afraid to assist injured victims in the future.

3) “Publicly available evidence that the strikes have made the US safer overall is ambiguous at best.” They are more likely to increase recruitment for militant groups. A recent Pew Research Center study found 74% percent of Pakistanis consider the U.S. an enemy. According to the New York Times, “drones have replaced Guantánamo as the recruiting tool of choice for militants.”

4) “Current US targeted killings and drone strike practices undermine respect for the rule of law and international legal protections and may set dangerous precedents.”  These attacks are carried out by the CIA and not the military, in countries that the U.S. is not at war with. Other governments may feel they also have a right, as the U.S. appears to feel it does, to target drone strikes on human targets without transparency or accountability.

Robert Greenwald’s Brave New Foundation is assisting in spreading the information on the report with this short video:

“Living Under Drones” Report

warcosts.com

Posted in foreign policy, law, media, military, Pakistan, Terrorism, war | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment