That’s a Drag

Posted in cartoon, civil liberties, crime, law, law enforcement, political cartoon, political humor | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Nature Has Spoken

Posted in Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, political humor, poster | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Election Postmortem

By Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

Some random thoughts that filtered through my mind after the Tuesday election…..

I’m happy, but not excited.  We’ll now have a moderate Democratic president, a Democratic majority in the Senate, and the Republicans control the House. Wait a minute, isn’t that what we have now? And how has that worked out so far? Gridlock wins again.

My prediction for the 2016 presidential race: Christie vs. Warren.

Will there be a different Obama? I and many progressives were burned by Obama four years ago when he started appointing the usual suspects to his economic and military team, and turned out to be too willing to compromise with an intransigent Republic Party. I don’t expect a much different second-term Barack Obama. A couple of tests for him: (1) will he push strongly for a constitutional amendment overturning Citizens United? (2) Will he let loose the Justice Department to go after the Wall Street banksters that crashed the economy in 2007-08? Not likely, but I hope I’m wrong.

Apparently I wasn’t the only one that turned to Fox News after Ohio was declared for Obama. It was just too tempting to watch the Fox talking heads squirming and melting down as Obama racked up wins. Karl Rove just couldn’t accept Ohio being called for the president so early. I’m waiting for sleazeball Dick Morris’s explanation as to why Romney didn’t win in a landslide. I also couldn’t resist listening to Rush this morning. He seemed stunned and perplexed. I love it!

I’m pleased that several progressive Democratic senators replaced blue-dog ones. Also, that more women and openly gay candidates were able to win, and the worst of the pro-rape Republican senators were defeated. And hooray for Alan Grayson, and a kick in the rear for Allen West as he leaves.

There may be reports later, but apparently the privately owned, unverifiable  electronic voting machines behaved. And besides that, the issues of voter suppression, long lines to vote, etc just have to be addressed. Totally inexcusable in 21st Century America.

Things will never change in the U.S. Senate until the milquetoast majority leader, Harry Reid, changes the rules to make filibusters more difficult. I am confident that if the GOP had gained control of the Senate, Mitch McConnell would have eliminated filibusters altogether. In the House, Speaker John Boehner seems slightly more reasonable than his Tea Party colleagues, but will he stand up to them if the president is willing to deal?

Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, elections, media, Mitt Romney, politics, Republican Party, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tough Night For Fox News

Posted in Barack Obama, cartoon, elections, media, Mitt Romney | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Choose Your Bidder

BPR Quote of the Day:

Posted in elections, Quotations | Tagged | Leave a comment

Circle Jerks

Posted in cartoon, economy, government, Wall Street | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Obama, “Dominatrix” of the Liberal Class

The S&M Election

By Chris Hedges/ Truthdig/ November 5, 2012

Illustration by Mr. Fish

I learned at the age of 10, when I was shipped off to a New England boarding school where the hazing of younger boys was the principal form of recreation, that those who hunger for power are psychopathic bastards. The bullies in the forms above me, the sadistic masters on our dormitory floors, the deans and the headmaster would morph in later life into bishops, newspaper editors, college presidents, politicians, heads of state, business titans and generals. Those who revel in the ability to manipulate and destroy are demented and deformed individuals. These severely diminished and stunted human beings — think Bill and Hillary Clinton — shower themselves, courtesy of elaborate public relations campaigns and an obsequious press, with encomiums of piety, patriotism, devoted public service, honor, courage and vision, not to mention a lot of money. They are at best mediocrities and usually venal. I have met enough of them to know.

So it is with some morbid fascination that I watch Barack Obama, who has become the prime “dominatrix” of the liberal class, force us in this election to plead for more humiliation and abuse. Obama has carried out a far more egregious assault on our civil liberties, including signing into law Section 1021(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), than George W. Bush. Section 1021(b)(2), which I challenged in federal court, permits the U.S. military to detain American citizens, strip them of due process and hold them indefinitely in military facilities. U.S. District Judge Katherine B. Forrest struck down the law in September. The Obama administration immediately appealed the decision. The NDAA has been accompanied by use of the Espionage Act, which Obama has turned to six times in silencing whistle-blowers. Obama supported the FISA Amendment Act so government could spy on tens of millions of us without warrants. He has drawn up kill lists to exterminate those, even U.S. citizens, deemed by the ruling elite to be terrorists.

Obama tells us that we better lick his boots or we will face the brute down the hall, Mitt Romney. After all, we wouldn’t want the bad people to get their hands on these newly minted mechanisms of repression. We will, if we do not behave, end up with a more advanced security and surveillance state, the completion of the XL Keystone pipeline, unchecked pillage from Wall Street, environmental catastrophe and even worse health care. Yet we know on some level that once the election is over, Obama will, if he is re-elected, again betray us. This is part of the game. We dutifully assume our position. We cry out in holy terror. We promise to obey. And we are mocked as we watch promises crumble into dust.

As we are steadily stripped of power, we desire with greater and greater fervor to be victims and slaves. Our relationship to corporate power increasingly mirrors that of ancient religious cults. Lucian writes of the priests of Cybele who, whipped into frenzy, castrated themselves to honor the goddess. Women devotees cut off their breasts. We are not far behind.

“Anyone who wants to rule men first tries to humiliate them, to trick them out of their rights and their capacity for resistance, until they are as powerless before him as animals,” wrote Elias Canetti in “Crowds and Power.” …

“He uses them like animals and, even if he does not tell them so, in himself he always knows quite clearly that they mean just as little to him; when he speaks to his intimates he will call them sheep or cattle. His ultimate aim is to incorporate them into himself and to suck the substance out of them. What remains of them afterwards does not matter to him. The worse he has treated them, the more he despises them. When they are no more use at all, he disposes of them as he does excrement, simply seeing to it that they do not poison the air of his house.”

Our masters rely on our labor to make them wealthy, on our children for cannon fodder in war and on our collective chants for adulation. They would otherwise happily slip us rat poison. When they retreat into their inner sanctums, which they keep hidden from public view, they speak in the cold words of manipulation, power and privilege, words that expose their visions of themselves as entitled and beyond the reach of morality or law.

The elite have produced a few manuals on power. Walter Lippmann’s “Public Opinion,” Leo Strauss’ work and “Atlas Shrugged” by the third-rate novelist Ayn Rand express the elite’s deep contempt for the sans-culottes. These writers posit that the masses are incapable of responding rationally to the complexities of power. They celebrate the role of a tiny, controlling elite that skillfully uses propaganda and symbols to, as Lippmann wrote, “manufacture consent.” They call on the power elite to operate in secrecy. The elite’s systems of propaganda are designed to magnify emotion and destroy the capacity for critical thought. Kafka was right: The modern world has made the irrational rational.

“Crowds have always undergone the influence of illusions,” wrote Gustave Le Bon, one of the first pioneers of the study of mass psychology. “Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim.”

The more we believe the lies that saturate our airwaves, the more we salute our “heroes” in Iraq or Afghanistan, the more we militarize social and political values, the more frightened we become, the more we bow down and clamor for enslavement, the more the elite detests us. We are, in their eyes, vermin. We have to be dealt with and controlled. At times we have to be placated. At other times we have to be repressed and even killed. But we are a headache. Our existence interferes with the privileges of the ruling class.

“Those who have put out the people’s eyes,” John Milton wrote, “reproach them of their blindness.”

(Continued-Read Entire Article Here)

Boldface by BPR Editor
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, elections, Mitt Romney, philosophy, politics, Republican Party | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Swing-State” Voters

Source Unknown
Posted in Barack Obama, elections, media, Mitt Romney, political humor, politics | 2 Comments

By All Rights, Democrats Should Win in a Landslide

By Arlen Grossman/ The Big Picture Report

By all rights, President Obama and the Democrats should win the 2012 election by a landslide. By all rights, President Obama should have no trouble defeating a wealthy private equity manager with shifting values and minimal personality. By all rights, Democrats should be building a strong majority in the Senate and should recapture the House. But that isn’t going to be the case.

The Alex character, in Sunday’s Doonesbury, summed it up quite aptly, “It just amazes me that only a few years after the economy was brought to its knees by a gang of predatory Wall Street plutocrats–that the GOP would nominate a predatory Wall Street plutocrat!”

Conservative ideology, i.e. tax cuts and deregulation, caused the 2008 financial meltdown, but the Republicans are sticking with it. The Tea Party has slipped in popularity, only 32 percent view the group favorably, 46 percent negatively. Only 25 percent of Americans identify as Republicans, compared to 32 percent who call themselves Democrats. President Obama is an incumbent president presiding over a difficult economy, but one that is gradually improving.

Despite all that, the Democratic Party will not win their landslide. The election is expected to be close, and Democrats will be lucky to be any better off after this election than before.

The reason for this anomaly boils down to two significant problems for Democrats. Most important is the huge advantage in money enjoyed by Republicans and their wealthy benefactors. When the Supreme Court gave the green light to unlimited campaign donations, Republicans could be confident they would always be competitive. Super PACS are able to funnel millions of dollars of campaign contributions, often from undisclosed billionaire donors, into political races large and small, all over the country. It’s a great investment, too, considering the big bang for their bucks they receive in subsidies, tax breaks, and favorable legislation.

The second problem for Democrats is the massive right-wing propaganda machine spewing out conservative messages to receptive audiences.  The days of political consensus are a thing of the past. Were President Obama to rescue a helpless little girl from a burning building, a large chunk of the population would hear and believe that the President was encouraging the kid to be dependent and denying the child a chance to learn how to save herself. Right-wing media have absolutely nothing good to say about President Obama or any Democrats but never run short of negative talking points. Left-wing media does the same for its side, but has nowhere near the national coverage or influence of their competitors.

Because Republican candidates, no matter how unqualified or extreme, can count on substantial campaign contributions, as well as favorable coverage from sympathetic media, many GOP candidates that by all rights shouldn’t be in competitive races, are in relatively good shape heading into Election Day.

osundefender.org

If Democrats survive the election with an Obama victory and a relative status quo in Congress they should consider themselves fortunate. There is not a lot they can do about the right-wing media edge (except finding rich liberals to buy more outlets), but if they don’t figure out how to lessen the impact of unlimited campaign contributions, they will always be struggling to stay competitive in future elections. A constitutional amendment or a new Supreme Court must bring down the “money is free speech” and “corporations are people” doctrines and return politics and elections to the American people.

Democracy is being gutted by obscene campaign spending and unprecedented disinformation. By all rights, the American people deserve to have their democracy returned intact.

ALSO PUBLISHED IN OPEDNEWS.COM (Headline Status) November 5, 2012
Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, elections, government, Mitt Romney, politics, Republican Party, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Obstacles

click to enlarge
McFadden/ New York Times
Posted in cartoon, elections, law, political humor, politics | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments