Eric Holder Admits Some Banks Are Just Too Big To Prosecute
By Mark Gongloff/ Huffington Post/ March 6, 2013
When the Attorney General of the United States admits some banks are simply too big to prosecute, it might be time to admit we have a problem — and that goes for both the financial and justice systems.
Eric Holder made this rather startling confession in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, The Hill reports. It could be a key moment in the debate over whether to do something about the size and complexity of our biggest banks, which have only gotten bigger and more systemically important since the financial crisis.
“I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if you do prosecute, if you do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy,” Holder said, according to The Hill. “And I think that is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large.”
Holder’s comments don’t come as a total surprise. His underlings had already made similar confessions to The New York Times last year, after they declined to prosecute HSBC for flagrant, years-long violations of money-laundering laws, out of fear that doing so would hurt the global economy. Lanny Breuer, formerly in charge of doling out the Justice Department’s wrist slaps to banks, told Frontline as much in the documentary “The Untouchables,” which aired in January.
Some observers have defended the Justice Department, suggesting that prosecuting law-breaking banks would amount to a death penalty that could upset the financial system and trigger another recession — although nobody really knows if it would do any such thing. But by not prosecuting law-breaking banks, and confessing to its terror of prosecuting those banks, the Justice Department has waved a big checkered flag to the biggest banks to go ahead and break all of the laws they want.
Holder’s confession comes after several weeks of criticism from lawmakers about the Justice Department’s failure to prosecute banks not only for potentially hard-to-prove cases involving the financial crisis, but also for cases in which proof wasn’t as hard to find, as in HSBC’s case.
It is significant that Holder’s confession — cry for help, really — comes at the one place that could possibly help, the U.S. Congress. So now you have the Obama administration joining a growing, bipartisan group of lawmakers speaking out about the problem of banks being too big to fail and/or jail. Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and David Vitter (R-La.) last week announced they were working together on bipartisan legislation to address it.
That doesn’t mean you should hold your breath for anything to be done about it right away, or ever. It is far easier to talk about breaking up the big banks than to do it, particularly given that they will lobby hard against it every step of the way. But the tide of public opinion is turning against them a little more every day.
Bizarre, huh? Sending a few high-level banksters to prison will ruin our economy? I don’t get it. You mean nobody can replace these guys? Very far-fetched. The truth is the banks are more powerful than the government because the government allowed them to get this big.
Sending several hundred bankers to prison after the Savings&Loan crisis did not ruin the economy. And there are absolutely thousands of qualified people just waiting for a chance to move up the ladder: somehow, when a company CEO retires or leaves for another job, the company almost always manages to find someone else to replace him and doesn’t fall apart.
Apparently, the fact that the big banks are free to engage in any kind of criminal activity without any fear of prosecution (and will do that), is supposedly less harmful for the national and world economy… Excellent logic.