The Cold, Hard Truth About Veteran’s Day

By Arlen Grossman

I wish nothing but the best for America’s veterans. But let’s get real on this Veteran’s Day. We will hear over and over that our soldiers “defended our country” and “fought for our freedoms.”

But how accurate is that? After World War II American troops have invaded and bombed countries all over the world, none of which realistically were threats to us or our freedoms. We have been the aggressors. In fact, the last officially declared war America fought was WWII. Only when we accept these unpleasant truths will we pull back from policing the world and truly work to defend our country. It is not the fault of our veterans, but, sadly, they make the biggest sacrifices.

A highly decorated Marine, Major General Smedley Butler, figured it out years ago. “I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.”

Also published in the Monterey Herald Nov. 13.

bm5620528a

Posted in foreign policy, military, war | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

If You Missed the 4th GOP Debate…

Twelve-second summary of the Republican Debate on the Fox Business Network:  “We will cut taxes and regulations and grow the economy. Hillary Clinton will destroy the economy. We can’t agree on what to do about illegal immigrants or military spending. Check my website for my plan to fix all of it!”

$_35

Posted in debates, politics, Republican Party | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Paul Ryan For President?

By Arlen Grossman

When you look at the current crop of Republican presidential candidates, it is hard to imagine any of them nominated by the party to run for the highest office in our land.

In one way or another the current field lacks the gravitas, charisma, ideas, judgement and/or intellect to handle the job of leader of the free world.

If the GOP expects to beat Hillary Clinton–or even Bernie Sanders– in 2016, it probably won’t be by anyone among the candidates running now. Donald Trump is not a serious candidate. Dr. Ben Carson has proven to be a serial liar.  Lacking charisma, Jeb Bush is fading fast. Carly Fiorina’s business record is flawed. Ted Cruz is too extreme, and Marco Rubio too young and inexperienced.  The rest don’t excite or interest the voters.

But Republicans desperately want to win and have plenty of money to help make it happen. So, to whom do they turn? Based on the current crop, it just might have to be a candidate not currently running for president.

That’s why an outsider, Wisconsin Representative Paul Ryan to be specific, could be poised to accept the Republican Party’s nomination to run for president. Ryan, vetted as a vice-presidential candidate for the GOP in 2012, is well-respected inside and outside of the Beltway. When the party desperately needed someone to take over as Speaker of the House, they turned to Ryan, who was acceptable to establishment and Tea Party Republicans. The mainstream media has always liked the good-looking, hard-working conservative policy wonk.

Paul_Ryan_pathtoprosperity_ap_img_0

       Paul Ryan touts his 2012 federal budget plan. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

At age 45 and with young children, Ryan would probably prefer to make a run for president later down the line. But with the GOP stumbling to find a viable, electable candidate, he might feel his destiny is to rescue his party and his country and take the plunge early. As an added incentive, his family would be able to live with him at the White House.

As a progressive, I’m not advocating for Ryan, and the Republican Party isn’t asking for my advice. But I think Democratics should be prepared for such an eventuality. Ryan would be a formidable candidate and would have a far better chance of being elected president than anyone we’ll see on the Republican debate stage.

Paul Ryan for President. Yes, it really could happen.

Also published at OpEdNews, Nov. 11 
Posted in elections, government, Paul Ryan, politics, Republican Party | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Who Gets Our Money?

econ aid

Image | Posted on by | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The “War on Terror” Hoax

The “War On Terror” Is The Hoax Foundation Of The Police/Spy State 

By Paul Craig Roberts/ paulcraigroberts.org/ November 5, 2015

wac-a-terrorist

The “war on terror” was a hoax. Americans were deceived by policymakers, who are pursuing a hegemonic agenda. The American people were too trusting and too gullible and, consequently, Americans were easily betrayed by Washington and by the presstitute media.

The consequences of the deceit, gullibility, and betrayal are horrendous for Americans, for millions of peoples in the Middle East, Africa, Ukraine, and for Washington’s European vassals. 

The consequences for Americans are an aborted Constitution, a police/spy state and rising resentment and hatred of America around the world.

The consequences for peoples in Somolia, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Syria, Palestine, and Ukraine have been massive deaths and dislocations, infrastructure destruction, internal conflicts, birth defects, invasions, bombings, drones. Millions of peoples have been murdered by Washington’s pursuit of hegemony, and millions have been turned into refugees.

The consequences for Washington’s European vassals is that the millions of refugees from Washington’s wars are now overrunning Europe, causing social and political discord and threatening the European political parties that enabled, and participated in, Washington’s massive war crimes in eight countries.

The populations of the eight countries and Washington’s vassals are stuck with the consequences of Washington’s evil, vicious, and illegal actions. And Americans are stuck with the police/spy state and militarized police who murder three Americans each day and brutalize countless others. 

The countries we have destroyed have no recourse to restitution. 

Our European vassals will have to provide from their own pockets for the refugees that Washington’s wars are sending to them. 

As for Americans, they seem to have settled into acquiescence to the brutal police/spy state that has crowded out freedom and democracy. 

But Americans could do something about it.

It is a proven fact that the police/spy state rests on a foundation of lies and deceptions, and these lies and deceptions are now known. Even George W. Bush has admitted that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Thousands of independent experts consisting of physicists, nanochemists, structural engineers, highrise architects, fire fighters and first responders, and military and civilian pilots have provided the detailed explanations of September 11, 2001, that Washington failed to provide. Today not even an idiot believes the official explanation. The corrupt neoconservative Bush regime created a false reality and sold it to a trusting population that was anxious to prove its patriotism.

The American electorate knew that the Bush/Cheney regime had deceived them about many things, and the people, believing Obama’s promises of change, put him in office to rectify the situation. Instead, Obama protected the criminal Bush/Cheney regime and continued with the neoconservatives agenda. 

We don’t have to stand for this. We can turn off Fox “News,” CNN, NPR and all the rest of the presstitutes who lie for a living. We can cease purchasing the useless newspapers. We can demand that the police/spy state that was created entirely on the basis of lies and deceptions be rolled back.

Who can possibly believe that the massive PATRIOT Act was written so quickly in the aftermath of 9/11? It is not possible that every member of Congress and the staff does not know that such a massive document was sitting on the shelf waiting its opportunity.

Who can possibly believe that a handful of Saudi Arabians acting without the support of any state and any intelligence service could outwit the entire apparatus of the American National Security State and inflict a humiliating defeat on the world’s only superpower?

9/11 is the worst national security failure in world history. Who can possibly believe that not a single one of the national security officials who so totally failed in their responsibilities was held accountable for their failures that brought total humiliation to the proud United States?

Who can possibly believe that the Bush regime’s invasion and destruction of Iraq was a response to 9/11 when Bush’s Treasury Secretary publicly stated that the invasion of Iraq was the topic of the Bush regime’s first cabinet meeting long prior to 9/11?

Are the American people really such washed-up sheeple, such cowards, that they acquiesce to a police/spy state, the foundation of which consists of nothing but lies told by criminals and repeated endlessly by whores pretending to be journalists?

If so, the American people are not a people who any longer matter, and they will continue to be treated by Washington and by their local police as people who do not matter.

Posted in military, war, War on Terror | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

If You Missed the GOP Debate…..

Ten-second summary of the Republican Debate: “Government ruins everything. Cutting taxes is good. Hillary is dangerous. I’m the only candidate with a plan to fix it all!”


images

Posted in debates, politics, Republican Party | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Bankers Can Be Jailed? In Iceland They Can

Iceland Just Jailed Dozens of Corrupt Bankers for 74 Years, The Opposite of What America Does

The prosecution of the Icelandic bankers represents an accountability that does not exist in America.

By Jay Syrmopoulos/ The Free Thought Project/ October 21, 2015

iceland-arrests-bankers

Raykovich, Iceland – In stark contrast to the record low number of prosecutions [3] of CEO’s and high-level financial executives in the U.S., Iceland has just sentenced 26 bankers to a combined 74 years in prison.

The majority of those convicted have been sentenced to prison terms of two to five years. The maximum penalty in Iceland for financial crimes is six years, although hearings are currently underway to consider extending the maximum beyond six years.

The prosecutions are the result of Iceland’s banksters manipulating the Icelandic financial markets after Iceland deregulated their finance sector in 2001. Eventually, an accumulation of foreign debt resulted in a meltdown of the entire banking sector in 2008.

According to Iceland Magazine [4]:

In two separate rulings last week, the Supreme Court of Iceland and the Reykjavík District Court sentenced three top managers of Landsbankinn [5] and two top managers of Kaupþing [6], along with one prominent investor, to prison for crimes committed in the lead-up to the financial collapse of 2008. With these rulings the number of bankers and financiers who have been sentenced to prison for crimes relating to the financial collapse has reached 26, and a combined prison time of 74 years.

Massive debts were incurred in the name of the Icelandic public, to allow the country to continue to function, which are still being repaid to the IMF and other nations eight years later by the citizens of Iceland. In contrast to the U.S., Iceland has chosen to hold the criminals that manipulated their financial system accountable under the law.

In the U.S., not a single banking executive was charged with crimes related to the 2008 financial crisis [7], even though the U.S. itself precipitated the crisis. Icelandic President, Olafur Ragnar Grimmson summed it up best in his response when asked how his country recovered from the global financial crisis.

“We were wise enough not to follow the traditional prevailing orthodoxies of the Western financial world in the last 30 years. We introduced currency controls, we let the banks fail, we provided support for the people and didn’t introduce austerity measures like you’re seeing in Europe.”

While Iceland has prosecuted those that caused their financial crisis, America has done the opposite. In 2008, after Congress bailed out the failing American banks to the tune of $700 billion dollars, courtesy of the American taxpayer, many of the executives of institutions that received TARP bailout funds ended up getting large bonuses!

The prosecution of the Icelandic banksters represents an accountability that does not exist in the United States of America. It seems clear that the financial “Masters of the Universe” are the ones that truly control the political apparatus in the U.S., making it obvious there is no one who is going to hold them accountable for manipulating and crashing the financial markets.

Please share this article to help expose who really controls the political system in the United States!!

Jay Syrmopoulos is an investigative journalist whose work has previously been published on BenSwann.com and WeAreChange.org. Follow him on Twitter @sirmetropolis [8].
 

Posted in economy, finance, politics, scandals | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE REAL DEBATE WINNER

debate

By Arlen Grossman

Being a Bernie supporter, I was naturally impressed with his positions and his performance last night. He stated his views vigorously and unapologetically (with the possible exception of his position on guns). At the same time, Hillary also was impressive. Although I thought Bernie did the best, I would have to concede that the real winner last night was probably Hillary (as well as the Democratic Party). I say that because I believe the race is Hillary’s to lose, and she certainly didn’t lose any ground last night. She looked and sounded good, and the corporate media is making sure everyone knows it. It will be tough for Bernie to catch up with her, although he’s making a valiant effort.

I also think the debates will discourage Joe Biden from throwing his hat in the ring (his only real chance would have been if Hillary faltered). The other three candidates, O’Malley, Webb and Chaffee, must as well pack up their bags and go home.

Posted in debates, elections, politics | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

GOOD QUESTION

Bernie Won All the Focus Groups & Online Polls, So Why Is the Media Saying Hillary Won the Debate?

By Adam Johnson/Alternet.org/October 14, 2015

Debate

CNN.com

Who “won” a debate is inherently subjective. The idea of winning a debate necessarily entails a goal to be achieved. What this goal is, therefore, says as much about the person judging its achievement as the goal itself. Pundits are ostensibly supposed to judge whether or not a candidate said what “the voters” want to hear. But what ends up happening, invariably, is they end up judging whether or not the candidate said what they think voters wanted to hear. This, after all, is why pundits exist, to act as a clergy class charged with interpreting people’s own inscrutable opinions for them. The chasm between what the pundits saw and what the public saw was quite big last night.

Bernie Sanders by all objective measures “won” the debate. Hands down. I don’t say this as a personal analysis of the debate; the very idea of winning a debate is silly to me. I say this because based on the only relatively objective metric we have, online polls and focus groups, he did win. And it’s not even close.

Sanders won the CNN focus group, [3] the Fusion focus group [4], and the Fox News focus group [5]; in the latter, he even converted several Hillary supporters. He won the Slate online poll [6], CNN/Time online poll [7], 9News Colorado [8], The Street online poll [9], Fox5 poll, [10] the conservative Drudge online poll [11] and the liberal Daily Kos online poll [12]. There wasn’t, to this writer’s knowledge, a poll he didn’t win by at least an 18-point margin. But you wouldn’t know this from reading the “establishment” press. The New York Times [13], the New Yorker [14], CNN [15], Politico [16], Slate [17], New York Magazine [18], and Vox [19] all unanimously say Hillary Clinton cleaned house. What gives?

Firstly, it’s important to point out that online polls, and to a lesser extent focus groups, are obviously not scientific. But it’s also important to point out that the echo chamber musings of establishment liberal pundits is far, far less scientific. It wasn’t that the online polls and focus groups had Sanders winning, it’s that they had him winning by a lot. And it wasn’t just that the pundit class has Clinton winning, it’s that they had her winning by a lot. This gap speaks to a larger gap we’ve seen since the beginning of the Sanders campaign. The mainstream media writes off Bernie and is constantly shocked [20] when his polls numbers go up. What explains this phenomenon? Freddie DeBoer had this to say [21]:

This morning, I’ve been pointing out on Twitter that the unanimity of pro-Hillary Clinton journalism coming from the mouthpieces of establishment Democratic politics — Slate, Vox, New York Magazine, etc. — is entirely predictable and has no meaningful relationship to her actual performance at the debate last night. That’s because, one, the Democrats are a centrist party that is interested in maintaining the stranglehold of the DNC establishment on their presidential politics, and these publications toe that line. And second, because Clinton has long been assumed to be the heavy favorite to win the presidency, these publications are in a heated battle to produce the most sympathetic coverage, in order to gain access. That is a tried-and-true method of career advancement in political journalism. Ezra Klein was a well-regarded blogger and journalist. He became the most influential journalist in DC (and someone, I can tell you with great confidence, that young political journalists are terrified of crossing) through his rabid defense of Obamacare, and subsequent access to the President. That people would try and play the same role with Clinton is as natural and unsurprising as I can imagine.

Many establishment journalists were in a hurry to declare Clinton not just the winner of the debate, but of the election. One fairly creepy exchange between Ryan Lizza of the New Yorker and Alec MacGillis summed it up nicely:

“Pretend” there’s a race? Isn’t that sort of the whole point of democracy? To have as much debate and vetting as possible before nominating a potential leader of the free world? Matt Yglesias at Vox also dismissed this entire primary process out of hand:

It’s unclear what the rush is. The first primary is months away, yet they’re ready to call it based entirely on an ad hoc analysis of one debate. This tweet by Michael Cohen of the Boston Globe perfectly sums up mainstream media’s cluelessness:

A “protest candidate”? If Cohen hasn’t noticed, the electorate is full of piss and vinegar and rancor [22], which is precisely why an otherwise obscure, self-described Socialist has risen in the polls the way he has.

But the question still remains: why the rush to write off Sanders? Why the constant gap between how the public perceives Sanders and how the mainstream media does? Why, most of all, would anyone listen to the very same pundit class that was wrong in ’08 and continues to be wrong in 2015.

Posted in debates, media, politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Makes Sense

11053374_10206364595706091_3880601857717895145_n

Image | Posted on by | Tagged | Leave a comment